|  | //@ check-pass | 
|  |  | 
|  | // These types were previously considered equal as they are subtypes of each other. | 
|  | // This has been changed in #118247 and we now consider them to be disjoint. | 
|  | // | 
|  | // * `for<'a, 'b> fn(&'a u32, &'b u32)` | 
|  | // * `for<'c> fn(&'c u32, &'c u32)` | 
|  | // | 
|  | // These types are subtypes of each other as: | 
|  | // | 
|  | // * `'c` can be the intersection of `'a` and `'b` (and there is always an intersection) | 
|  | // * `'a` and `'b` can both be equal to `'c` | 
|  |  | 
|  | trait Trait {} | 
|  | impl Trait for for<'a, 'b> fn(&'a u32, &'b u32) {} | 
|  | impl Trait for for<'c> fn(&'c u32, &'c u32) { | 
|  | //~^ WARN conflicting implementations of trait `Trait` for type `for<'a, 'b> fn(&'a u32, &'b u32)` [coherence_leak_check] | 
|  | //~| WARN the behavior may change in a future release | 
|  | // | 
|  | // Note in particular that we do NOT get a future-compatibility warning | 
|  | // here. This is because the new leak-check proposed in [MCP 295] does not | 
|  | // "error" when these two types are equated. | 
|  | // | 
|  | // [MCP 295]: https://github.com/rust-lang/compiler-team/issues/295 | 
|  | } | 
|  |  | 
|  | fn main() {} |