blob: 9844377d0bd32f5241c1e0cb948f48597c1d5673 [file] [log] [blame]
// Copyright 2012-2014 The Rust Project Developers. See the COPYRIGHT
// file at the top-level directory of this distribution and at
// http://rust-lang.org/COPYRIGHT.
//
// Licensed under the Apache License, Version 2.0 <LICENSE-APACHE or
// http://www.apache.org/licenses/LICENSE-2.0> or the MIT license
// <LICENSE-MIT or http://opensource.org/licenses/MIT>, at your
// option. This file may not be copied, modified, or distributed
// except according to those terms.
use middle::free_region::FreeRegionMap;
use rustc::infer::{self, InferOk, TypeOrigin};
use rustc::ty;
use rustc::traits::{self, ProjectionMode};
use rustc::ty::error::ExpectedFound;
use rustc::ty::subst::{self, Subst, Substs, VecPerParamSpace};
use syntax::ast;
use syntax_pos::Span;
use CrateCtxt;
use super::assoc;
/// Checks that a method from an impl conforms to the signature of
/// the same method as declared in the trait.
///
/// # Parameters
///
/// - impl_m: type of the method we are checking
/// - impl_m_span: span to use for reporting errors
/// - impl_m_body_id: id of the method body
/// - trait_m: the method in the trait
/// - impl_trait_ref: the TraitRef corresponding to the trait implementation
pub fn compare_impl_method<'a, 'tcx>(ccx: &CrateCtxt<'a, 'tcx>,
impl_m: &ty::Method<'tcx>,
impl_m_span: Span,
impl_m_body_id: ast::NodeId,
trait_m: &ty::Method<'tcx>,
impl_trait_ref: &ty::TraitRef<'tcx>) {
debug!("compare_impl_method(impl_trait_ref={:?})",
impl_trait_ref);
debug!("compare_impl_method: impl_trait_ref (liberated) = {:?}",
impl_trait_ref);
let tcx = ccx.tcx;
let trait_to_impl_substs = &impl_trait_ref.substs;
// Try to give more informative error messages about self typing
// mismatches. Note that any mismatch will also be detected
// below, where we construct a canonical function type that
// includes the self parameter as a normal parameter. It's just
// that the error messages you get out of this code are a bit more
// inscrutable, particularly for cases where one method has no
// self.
match (&trait_m.explicit_self, &impl_m.explicit_self) {
(&ty::ExplicitSelfCategory::Static,
&ty::ExplicitSelfCategory::Static) => {}
(&ty::ExplicitSelfCategory::Static, _) => {
span_err!(tcx.sess, impl_m_span, E0185,
"method `{}` has a `{}` declaration in the impl, \
but not in the trait",
trait_m.name,
impl_m.explicit_self);
return;
}
(_, &ty::ExplicitSelfCategory::Static) => {
span_err!(tcx.sess, impl_m_span, E0186,
"method `{}` has a `{}` declaration in the trait, \
but not in the impl",
trait_m.name,
trait_m.explicit_self);
return;
}
_ => {
// Let the type checker catch other errors below
}
}
let num_impl_m_type_params = impl_m.generics.types.len(subst::FnSpace);
let num_trait_m_type_params = trait_m.generics.types.len(subst::FnSpace);
if num_impl_m_type_params != num_trait_m_type_params {
span_err!(tcx.sess, impl_m_span, E0049,
"method `{}` has {} type parameter{} \
but its trait declaration has {} type parameter{}",
trait_m.name,
num_impl_m_type_params,
if num_impl_m_type_params == 1 {""} else {"s"},
num_trait_m_type_params,
if num_trait_m_type_params == 1 {""} else {"s"});
return;
}
if impl_m.fty.sig.0.inputs.len() != trait_m.fty.sig.0.inputs.len() {
span_err!(tcx.sess, impl_m_span, E0050,
"method `{}` has {} parameter{} \
but the declaration in trait `{}` has {}",
trait_m.name,
impl_m.fty.sig.0.inputs.len(),
if impl_m.fty.sig.0.inputs.len() == 1 {""} else {"s"},
tcx.item_path_str(trait_m.def_id),
trait_m.fty.sig.0.inputs.len());
return;
}
// This code is best explained by example. Consider a trait:
//
// trait Trait<'t,T> {
// fn method<'a,M>(t: &'t T, m: &'a M) -> Self;
// }
//
// And an impl:
//
// impl<'i, 'j, U> Trait<'j, &'i U> for Foo {
// fn method<'b,N>(t: &'j &'i U, m: &'b N) -> Foo;
// }
//
// We wish to decide if those two method types are compatible.
//
// We start out with trait_to_impl_substs, that maps the trait
// type parameters to impl type parameters. This is taken from the
// impl trait reference:
//
// trait_to_impl_substs = {'t => 'j, T => &'i U, Self => Foo}
//
// We create a mapping `dummy_substs` that maps from the impl type
// parameters to fresh types and regions. For type parameters,
// this is the identity transform, but we could as well use any
// skolemized types. For regions, we convert from bound to free
// regions (Note: but only early-bound regions, i.e., those
// declared on the impl or used in type parameter bounds).
//
// impl_to_skol_substs = {'i => 'i0, U => U0, N => N0 }
//
// Now we can apply skol_substs to the type of the impl method
// to yield a new function type in terms of our fresh, skolemized
// types:
//
// <'b> fn(t: &'i0 U0, m: &'b) -> Foo
//
// We now want to extract and substitute the type of the *trait*
// method and compare it. To do so, we must create a compound
// substitution by combining trait_to_impl_substs and
// impl_to_skol_substs, and also adding a mapping for the method
// type parameters. We extend the mapping to also include
// the method parameters.
//
// trait_to_skol_substs = { T => &'i0 U0, Self => Foo, M => N0 }
//
// Applying this to the trait method type yields:
//
// <'a> fn(t: &'i0 U0, m: &'a) -> Foo
//
// This type is also the same but the name of the bound region ('a
// vs 'b). However, the normal subtyping rules on fn types handle
// this kind of equivalency just fine.
//
// We now use these substitutions to ensure that all declared bounds are
// satisfied by the implementation's method.
//
// We do this by creating a parameter environment which contains a
// substitution corresponding to impl_to_skol_substs. We then build
// trait_to_skol_substs and use it to convert the predicates contained
// in the trait_m.generics to the skolemized form.
//
// Finally we register each of these predicates as an obligation in
// a fresh FulfillmentCtxt, and invoke select_all_or_error.
// Create a parameter environment that represents the implementation's
// method.
let impl_m_node_id = tcx.map.as_local_node_id(impl_m.def_id).unwrap();
let impl_param_env = ty::ParameterEnvironment::for_item(tcx, impl_m_node_id);
// Create mapping from impl to skolemized.
let impl_to_skol_substs = &impl_param_env.free_substs;
// Create mapping from trait to skolemized.
let trait_to_skol_substs =
trait_to_impl_substs
.subst(tcx, impl_to_skol_substs).clone()
.with_method(impl_to_skol_substs.types.get_slice(subst::FnSpace).to_vec(),
impl_to_skol_substs.regions.get_slice(subst::FnSpace).to_vec());
debug!("compare_impl_method: trait_to_skol_substs={:?}",
trait_to_skol_substs);
// Check region bounds. FIXME(@jroesch) refactor this away when removing
// ParamBounds.
if !check_region_bounds_on_impl_method(ccx,
impl_m_span,
impl_m,
&trait_m.generics,
&impl_m.generics,
&trait_to_skol_substs,
impl_to_skol_substs) {
return;
}
tcx.infer_ctxt(None, None, ProjectionMode::AnyFinal).enter(|mut infcx| {
let mut fulfillment_cx = traits::FulfillmentContext::new();
// Normalize the associated types in the trait_bounds.
let trait_bounds = trait_m.predicates.instantiate(tcx, &trait_to_skol_substs);
// Create obligations for each predicate declared by the impl
// definition in the context of the trait's parameter
// environment. We can't just use `impl_env.caller_bounds`,
// however, because we want to replace all late-bound regions with
// region variables.
let impl_bounds =
impl_m.predicates.instantiate(tcx, impl_to_skol_substs);
debug!("compare_impl_method: impl_bounds={:?}", impl_bounds);
// Obtain the predicate split predicate sets for each.
let trait_pred = trait_bounds.predicates.split();
let impl_pred = impl_bounds.predicates.split();
// This is the only tricky bit of the new way we check implementation methods
// We need to build a set of predicates where only the FnSpace bounds
// are from the trait and we assume all other bounds from the implementation
// to be previously satisfied.
//
// We then register the obligations from the impl_m and check to see
// if all constraints hold.
let hybrid_preds = VecPerParamSpace::new(
impl_pred.types,
impl_pred.selfs,
trait_pred.fns
);
// Construct trait parameter environment and then shift it into the skolemized viewpoint.
// The key step here is to update the caller_bounds's predicates to be
// the new hybrid bounds we computed.
let normalize_cause = traits::ObligationCause::misc(impl_m_span, impl_m_body_id);
let trait_param_env = impl_param_env.with_caller_bounds(hybrid_preds.into_vec());
let trait_param_env = traits::normalize_param_env_or_error(tcx,
trait_param_env,
normalize_cause.clone());
// FIXME(@jroesch) this seems ugly, but is a temporary change
infcx.parameter_environment = trait_param_env;
debug!("compare_impl_method: trait_bounds={:?}",
infcx.parameter_environment.caller_bounds);
let mut selcx = traits::SelectionContext::new(&infcx);
let (impl_pred_fns, _) =
infcx.replace_late_bound_regions_with_fresh_var(
impl_m_span,
infer::HigherRankedType,
&ty::Binder(impl_pred.fns));
for predicate in impl_pred_fns {
let traits::Normalized { value: predicate, .. } =
traits::normalize(&mut selcx, normalize_cause.clone(), &predicate);
let cause = traits::ObligationCause {
span: impl_m_span,
body_id: impl_m_body_id,
code: traits::ObligationCauseCode::CompareImplMethodObligation
};
fulfillment_cx.register_predicate_obligation(
&infcx,
traits::Obligation::new(cause, predicate));
}
// We now need to check that the signature of the impl method is
// compatible with that of the trait method. We do this by
// checking that `impl_fty <: trait_fty`.
//
// FIXME. Unfortunately, this doesn't quite work right now because
// associated type normalization is not integrated into subtype
// checks. For the comparison to be valid, we need to
// normalize the associated types in the impl/trait methods
// first. However, because function types bind regions, just
// calling `normalize_associated_types_in` would have no effect on
// any associated types appearing in the fn arguments or return
// type.
// Compute skolemized form of impl and trait method tys.
let tcx = infcx.tcx;
let origin = TypeOrigin::MethodCompatCheck(impl_m_span);
let (impl_sig, _) =
infcx.replace_late_bound_regions_with_fresh_var(impl_m_span,
infer::HigherRankedType,
&impl_m.fty.sig);
let impl_sig =
impl_sig.subst(tcx, impl_to_skol_substs);
let impl_sig =
assoc::normalize_associated_types_in(&infcx,
&mut fulfillment_cx,
impl_m_span,
impl_m_body_id,
&impl_sig);
let impl_fty = tcx.mk_fn_ptr(tcx.mk_bare_fn(ty::BareFnTy {
unsafety: impl_m.fty.unsafety,
abi: impl_m.fty.abi,
sig: ty::Binder(impl_sig)
}));
debug!("compare_impl_method: impl_fty={:?}", impl_fty);
let trait_sig = tcx.liberate_late_bound_regions(
infcx.parameter_environment.free_id_outlive,
&trait_m.fty.sig);
let trait_sig =
trait_sig.subst(tcx, &trait_to_skol_substs);
let trait_sig =
assoc::normalize_associated_types_in(&infcx,
&mut fulfillment_cx,
impl_m_span,
impl_m_body_id,
&trait_sig);
let trait_fty = tcx.mk_fn_ptr(tcx.mk_bare_fn(ty::BareFnTy {
unsafety: trait_m.fty.unsafety,
abi: trait_m.fty.abi,
sig: ty::Binder(trait_sig)
}));
debug!("compare_impl_method: trait_fty={:?}", trait_fty);
if let Err(terr) = infcx.sub_types(false, origin, impl_fty, trait_fty) {
debug!("sub_types failed: impl ty {:?}, trait ty {:?}",
impl_fty,
trait_fty);
let mut diag = struct_span_err!(
tcx.sess, origin.span(), E0053,
"method `{}` has an incompatible type for trait", trait_m.name
);
infcx.note_type_err(
&mut diag, origin,
Some(infer::ValuePairs::Types(ExpectedFound {
expected: trait_fty,
found: impl_fty
})), &terr
);
diag.emit();
return
}
// Check that all obligations are satisfied by the implementation's
// version.
if let Err(ref errors) = fulfillment_cx.select_all_or_error(&infcx) {
infcx.report_fulfillment_errors(errors);
return
}
// Finally, resolve all regions. This catches wily misuses of
// lifetime parameters. We have to build up a plausible lifetime
// environment based on what we find in the trait. We could also
// include the obligations derived from the method argument types,
// but I don't think it's necessary -- after all, those are still
// in effect when type-checking the body, and all the
// where-clauses in the header etc should be implied by the trait
// anyway, so it shouldn't be needed there either. Anyway, we can
// always add more relations later (it's backwards compat).
let mut free_regions = FreeRegionMap::new();
free_regions.relate_free_regions_from_predicates(
&infcx.parameter_environment.caller_bounds);
infcx.resolve_regions_and_report_errors(&free_regions, impl_m_body_id);
});
fn check_region_bounds_on_impl_method<'a, 'tcx>(ccx: &CrateCtxt<'a, 'tcx>,
span: Span,
impl_m: &ty::Method<'tcx>,
trait_generics: &ty::Generics<'tcx>,
impl_generics: &ty::Generics<'tcx>,
trait_to_skol_substs: &Substs<'tcx>,
impl_to_skol_substs: &Substs<'tcx>)
-> bool
{
let trait_params = trait_generics.regions.get_slice(subst::FnSpace);
let impl_params = impl_generics.regions.get_slice(subst::FnSpace);
debug!("check_region_bounds_on_impl_method: \
trait_generics={:?} \
impl_generics={:?} \
trait_to_skol_substs={:?} \
impl_to_skol_substs={:?}",
trait_generics,
impl_generics,
trait_to_skol_substs,
impl_to_skol_substs);
// Must have same number of early-bound lifetime parameters.
// Unfortunately, if the user screws up the bounds, then this
// will change classification between early and late. E.g.,
// if in trait we have `<'a,'b:'a>`, and in impl we just have
// `<'a,'b>`, then we have 2 early-bound lifetime parameters
// in trait but 0 in the impl. But if we report "expected 2
// but found 0" it's confusing, because it looks like there
// are zero. Since I don't quite know how to phrase things at
// the moment, give a kind of vague error message.
if trait_params.len() != impl_params.len() {
span_err!(ccx.tcx.sess, span, E0195,
"lifetime parameters or bounds on method `{}` do \
not match the trait declaration",
impl_m.name);
return false;
}
return true;
}
}
pub fn compare_const_impl<'a, 'tcx>(ccx: &CrateCtxt<'a, 'tcx>,
impl_c: &ty::AssociatedConst<'tcx>,
impl_c_span: Span,
trait_c: &ty::AssociatedConst<'tcx>,
impl_trait_ref: &ty::TraitRef<'tcx>) {
debug!("compare_const_impl(impl_trait_ref={:?})",
impl_trait_ref);
let tcx = ccx.tcx;
tcx.infer_ctxt(None, None, ProjectionMode::AnyFinal).enter(|infcx| {
let mut fulfillment_cx = traits::FulfillmentContext::new();
// The below is for the most part highly similar to the procedure
// for methods above. It is simpler in many respects, especially
// because we shouldn't really have to deal with lifetimes or
// predicates. In fact some of this should probably be put into
// shared functions because of DRY violations...
let trait_to_impl_substs = &impl_trait_ref.substs;
// Create a parameter environment that represents the implementation's
// method.
let impl_c_node_id = tcx.map.as_local_node_id(impl_c.def_id).unwrap();
let impl_param_env = ty::ParameterEnvironment::for_item(tcx, impl_c_node_id);
// Create mapping from impl to skolemized.
let impl_to_skol_substs = &impl_param_env.free_substs;
// Create mapping from trait to skolemized.
let trait_to_skol_substs =
trait_to_impl_substs
.subst(tcx, impl_to_skol_substs).clone()
.with_method(impl_to_skol_substs.types.get_slice(subst::FnSpace).to_vec(),
impl_to_skol_substs.regions.get_slice(subst::FnSpace).to_vec());
debug!("compare_const_impl: trait_to_skol_substs={:?}",
trait_to_skol_substs);
// Compute skolemized form of impl and trait const tys.
let impl_ty = impl_c.ty.subst(tcx, impl_to_skol_substs);
let trait_ty = trait_c.ty.subst(tcx, &trait_to_skol_substs);
let origin = TypeOrigin::Misc(impl_c_span);
let err = infcx.commit_if_ok(|_| {
// There is no "body" here, so just pass dummy id.
let impl_ty =
assoc::normalize_associated_types_in(&infcx,
&mut fulfillment_cx,
impl_c_span,
0,
&impl_ty);
debug!("compare_const_impl: impl_ty={:?}",
impl_ty);
let trait_ty =
assoc::normalize_associated_types_in(&infcx,
&mut fulfillment_cx,
impl_c_span,
0,
&trait_ty);
debug!("compare_const_impl: trait_ty={:?}",
trait_ty);
infcx.sub_types(false, origin, impl_ty, trait_ty)
.map(|InferOk { obligations, .. }| {
// FIXME(#32730) propagate obligations
assert!(obligations.is_empty())
})
});
if let Err(terr) = err {
debug!("checking associated const for compatibility: impl ty {:?}, trait ty {:?}",
impl_ty,
trait_ty);
let mut diag = struct_span_err!(
tcx.sess, origin.span(), E0326,
"implemented const `{}` has an incompatible type for trait",
trait_c.name
);
infcx.note_type_err(
&mut diag, origin,
Some(infer::ValuePairs::Types(ExpectedFound {
expected: trait_ty,
found: impl_ty
})), &terr
);
diag.emit();
}
});
}