blob: a6457f4a433c40aeb99c1356f0c837fc53ded185 [file] [log] [blame]
use crate::deriving::generic::ty::*;
use crate::deriving::generic::*;
use crate::deriving::{path_local, path_std};
use rustc_ast::ptr::P;
use rustc_ast::{BinOpKind, BorrowKind, Expr, ExprKind, MetaItem, Mutability};
use rustc_expand::base::{Annotatable, ExtCtxt};
use rustc_span::symbol::sym;
use rustc_span::Span;
use thin_vec::thin_vec;
pub(crate) fn expand_deriving_partial_eq(
cx: &ExtCtxt<'_>,
span: Span,
mitem: &MetaItem,
item: &Annotatable,
push: &mut dyn FnMut(Annotatable),
is_const: bool,
) {
fn cs_eq(cx: &ExtCtxt<'_>, span: Span, substr: &Substructure<'_>) -> BlockOrExpr {
let base = true;
let expr = cs_fold(
true, // use foldl
cx,
span,
substr,
|cx, fold| match fold {
CsFold::Single(field) => {
let [other_expr] = &field.other_selflike_exprs[..] else {
cx.dcx()
.span_bug(field.span, "not exactly 2 arguments in `derive(PartialEq)`");
};
// We received arguments of type `&T`. Convert them to type `T` by stripping
// any leading `&`. This isn't necessary for type checking, but
// it results in better error messages if something goes wrong.
//
// Note: for arguments that look like `&{ x }`, which occur with packed
// structs, this would cause expressions like `{ self.x } == { other.x }`,
// which isn't valid Rust syntax. This wouldn't break compilation because these
// AST nodes are constructed within the compiler. But it would mean that code
// printed by `-Zunpretty=expanded` (or `cargo expand`) would have invalid
// syntax, which would be suboptimal. So we wrap these in parens, giving
// `({ self.x }) == ({ other.x })`, which is valid syntax.
let convert = |expr: &P<Expr>| {
if let ExprKind::AddrOf(BorrowKind::Ref, Mutability::Not, inner) =
&expr.kind
{
if let ExprKind::Block(..) = &inner.kind {
// `&{ x }` form: remove the `&`, add parens.
cx.expr_paren(field.span, inner.clone())
} else {
// `&x` form: remove the `&`.
inner.clone()
}
} else {
expr.clone()
}
};
cx.expr_binary(
field.span,
BinOpKind::Eq,
convert(&field.self_expr),
convert(other_expr),
)
}
CsFold::Combine(span, expr1, expr2) => {
cx.expr_binary(span, BinOpKind::And, expr1, expr2)
}
CsFold::Fieldless => cx.expr_bool(span, base),
},
);
BlockOrExpr::new_expr(expr)
}
let structural_trait_def = TraitDef {
span,
path: path_std!(marker::StructuralPartialEq),
skip_path_as_bound: true, // crucial!
needs_copy_as_bound_if_packed: false,
additional_bounds: Vec::new(),
// We really don't support unions, but that's already checked by the impl generated below;
// a second check here would lead to redundant error messages.
supports_unions: true,
methods: Vec::new(),
associated_types: Vec::new(),
is_const: false,
};
structural_trait_def.expand(cx, mitem, item, push);
// No need to generate `ne`, the default suffices, and not generating it is
// faster.
let methods = vec![MethodDef {
name: sym::eq,
generics: Bounds::empty(),
explicit_self: true,
nonself_args: vec![(self_ref(), sym::other)],
ret_ty: Path(path_local!(bool)),
attributes: thin_vec![cx.attr_word(sym::inline, span)],
fieldless_variants_strategy: FieldlessVariantsStrategy::Unify,
combine_substructure: combine_substructure(Box::new(|a, b, c| cs_eq(a, b, c))),
}];
let trait_def = TraitDef {
span,
path: path_std!(cmp::PartialEq),
skip_path_as_bound: false,
needs_copy_as_bound_if_packed: true,
additional_bounds: Vec::new(),
supports_unions: false,
methods,
associated_types: Vec::new(),
is_const,
};
trait_def.expand(cx, mitem, item, push)
}