Mark two issues as complete
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/libcxx/trunk@324852 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
diff --git a/www/upcoming_meeting.html b/www/upcoming_meeting.html
index 88d2d9d..fa2b259 100644
--- a/www/upcoming_meeting.html
+++ b/www/upcoming_meeting.html
@@ -98,9 +98,9 @@
<table border="1">
<tr><th>Issue #</th><th>Issue Name</th><th>Meeting</th><th>Status</th></tr>
<tr><td><a href="https://wg21.link/LWG2412">2412</a></td><td><tt>promise::set_value()</tt> and <tt>promise::get_future()</tt> should not race</td><td>Jacksonville</td><td>Complete</td></tr>
-<tr><td><a href="https://wg21.link/LWG2682">2682</a></td><td><code>filesystem::copy()</code> won't create a symlink to a directory</td><td>Jacksonville</td><td></td></tr>
+<tr><td><a href="https://wg21.link/LWG2682">2682</a></td><td><code>filesystem::copy()</code> won't create a symlink to a directory</td><td>Jacksonville</td><td>Complete</td></tr>
<tr><td><a href="https://wg21.link/LWG2697">2697</a></td><td>[concurr.ts] Behavior of <tt>future/shared_future</tt> unwrapping constructor when given an invalid <tt>future</tt></td><td>Jacksonville</td><td></td></tr>
-<tr><td><a href="https://wg21.link/LWG2708">2708</a></td><td><tt>recursive_directory_iterator::recursion_pending()</tt> is incorrectly specified</td><td>Jacksonville</td><td></td></tr>
+<tr><td><a href="https://wg21.link/LWG2708">2708</a></td><td><tt>recursive_directory_iterator::recursion_pending()</tt> is incorrectly specified</td><td>Jacksonville</td><td>Complete</td></tr>
<tr><td><a href="https://wg21.link/LWG2936">2936</a></td><td>Path comparison is defined in terms of the generic format</td><td>Jacksonville</td><td></td></tr>
</table>
@@ -144,9 +144,9 @@
<h3>Comments about the "Review" issues</h3>
<ul>
<li> 2412 - I think we do this already</li>
-<li> 2682 - Eric - don't we do this already? </li>
+<li> 2682 - We already to this </li>
<li> 2697 - No concurrency TS implementation yet</li>
-<li> 2708 - Eric? </li>
+<li> 2708 - We already do this </li>
<li> 2936 - Eric - don't we do this already?</li>
</ul>
