| <html> | |
| <head> | |
| <title>SWIG:Examples:python:pointer</title> | |
| </head> | |
| <body bgcolor="#ffffff"> | |
| <tt>SWIG/Examples/python/pointer/</tt> | |
| <hr> | |
| <H2>Simple Pointer Handling</H2> | |
| <p> | |
| This example illustrates a couple of techniques for handling | |
| simple pointers in SWIG. The prototypical example is a C function | |
| that operates on pointers such as this: | |
| <blockquote> | |
| <pre> | |
| void add(int *x, int *y, int *r) { | |
| *r = *x + *y; | |
| } | |
| </pre> | |
| </blockquote> | |
| By default, SWIG wraps this function exactly as specified and creates | |
| an interface that expects pointer objects for arguments. The only | |
| problem is how does one go about creating these objects from a script? | |
| <h2>Possible Solutions</h2> | |
| <ul> | |
| <li>Write some helper functions to explicitly create objects. For | |
| example: | |
| <blockquote> | |
| <pre> | |
| int *new_int(int ivalue) { | |
| int *i = (int *) malloc(sizeof(ivalue)); | |
| *i = ivalue; | |
| return i; | |
| } | |
| int get_int(int *i) { | |
| return *i; | |
| } | |
| void delete_int(int *i) { | |
| free(i); | |
| } | |
| </pre> | |
| </blockquote> | |
| Now, in a script you would do this: | |
| <blockquote> | |
| <pre> | |
| a = new_int(37) | |
| b = new_int(42) | |
| c = new_int(0) | |
| add(a,b,c) | |
| r = get_int(c); | |
| print "Result =",r | |
| delete_int(a) | |
| delete_int(b) | |
| delete_int(c) | |
| </pre> | |
| </blockquote> | |
| <p> | |
| <li>Use the SWIG pointer library. For example, in the interface file | |
| you would do this: | |
| <blockquote> | |
| <pre> | |
| %include "pointer.i" | |
| </pre> | |
| </blockquote? | |
| and in a script you would do this: | |
| <blockquote> | |
| <pre> | |
| a = ptrcreate("int",37) | |
| b = ptrcreate("int",42) | |
| c = ptrcreate("int") | |
| add(a,b,c) | |
| r = ptrvalue(c) | |
| print "Result =",r | |
| ptrfree(a) | |
| ptrfree(b) | |
| ptrfree(c) | |
| </pre> | |
| </blockquote> | |
| The advantage to using the pointer library is that it unifies some of the helper | |
| functions behind a common set of names. For example, the same set of functions work | |
| with int, double, float, and other fundamental types. | |
| <p> | |
| <li>Use the SWIG typemap library. This library allows you to completely | |
| change the way arguments are processed by SWIG. For example: | |
| <blockquote> | |
| <pre> | |
| %include "typemaps.i" | |
| void add(int *INPUT, int *INPUT, int *OUTPUT); | |
| </pre> | |
| </blockquote> | |
| And in a script: | |
| <blockquote> | |
| <pre> | |
| r = add(37,42) | |
| print "Result =",r | |
| </pre> | |
| </blockquote> | |
| Needless to say, this is substantially easier. | |
| <p> | |
| <li>A final alternative is to use the typemaps library in combination | |
| with the %apply directive. This allows you to change the names of parameters | |
| that behave as input or output parameters. For example: | |
| <blockquote> | |
| <pre> | |
| %include "typemaps.i" | |
| %apply int *INPUT {int *x, int *y}; | |
| %apply int *OUTPUT {int *r}; | |
| void add(int *x, int *y, int *r); | |
| void sub(int *x, int *y, int *r); | |
| void mul(int *x, int *y, int *r); | |
| ... etc ... | |
| </pre> | |
| </blockquote> | |
| </ul> | |
| <h2>Example</h2> | |
| The following example illustrates the use of these features for pointer | |
| extraction. | |
| <ul> | |
| <li> <a href="example.c">example.c</a> (C Source) | |
| <li> <a href="example.i">example.i</a> (SWIG interface) | |
| <li> <a href="runme.py">runme.py</a> (Python Script) | |
| </ul> | |
| <h2>Notes</h2> | |
| <ul> | |
| <li>Since pointers are used for so many different things (arrays, output values, | |
| etc...) the complexity of pointer handling can be as complicated as you want to | |
| make it. | |
| <p> | |
| <li>More documentation on the typemaps.i and pointer.i library files can be | |
| found in the SWIG user manual. The files also contain documentation. | |
| <p> | |
| <li>The pointer.i library is designed primarily for convenience. If you | |
| are concerned about performance, you probably want to use a different | |
| approach. | |
| </ul> | |
| <hr> | |
| </body> | |
| </html> |