Merge pull request #2326 from kuzkry/missing-references-to-documentation

Add missing references to documentation
diff --git a/googlemock/docs/cook_book.md b/googlemock/docs/cook_book.md
index 4e20eaa..d040209 100644
--- a/googlemock/docs/cook_book.md
+++ b/googlemock/docs/cook_book.md
@@ -229,7 +229,7 @@
 will print a warning about the "uninteresting call". The rationale is:
 
   * New methods may be added to an interface after a test is written. We shouldn't fail a test just because a method it doesn't know about is called.
-  * However, this may also mean there's a bug in the test, so Google Mock shouldn't be silent either. If the user believes these calls are harmless, they can add an `EXPECT_CALL()` to suppress the warning.
+  * However, this may also mean there's a bug in the test, so Google Mock shouldn't be silent either. (Note that the user should [*not* add an `EXPECT_CALL()`](https://github.com/google/googletest/blob/master/googlemock/docs/CookBook.md#knowing-when-to-expect) to suppress the warning, even if they think the call is harmless).
 
 However, sometimes you may want to suppress all "uninteresting call"
 warnings, while sometimes you may want the opposite, i.e. to treat all