blob: 3477d906bc4645d3de5b0c9f692a93c0f620efac [file]
.. _common_issues:
Common issues
=============
This section has examples of cases when you need to update your code
to use static typing, and ideas for working around issues if mypy
doesn't work as expected. Statically typed code is often identical to
normal Python code, but sometimes you need to do things slightly
differently.
Can't install mypy using pip
----------------------------
If installation fails, you've probably hit one of these issues:
* Mypy needs Python 3.3 or later to run.
* You may have to run pip like this:
``python3 -m pip install mypy``.
.. _annotations_needed:
No errors reported for obviously wrong code
-------------------------------------------
There are several common reasons why obviously wrong code is not
flagged as an error.
- **The function containing the error is not annotated.** Functions that
do not have any annotations (neither for any argument nor for the
return type) are not type-checked, and even the most blatant type
errors (e.g. ``2 + 'a'``) pass silently. The solution is to add
annotations.
Example:
.. code-block:: python
def foo(a):
return '(' + a.split() + ')' # No error!
This gives no error even though ``a.split()`` is "obviously" a list
(the author probably meant ``a.strip()``). The error is reported
once you add annotations:
.. code-block:: python
def foo(a: str) -> str:
return '(' + a.split() + ')'
# error: Unsupported operand types for + ("str" and List[str])
If you don't know what types to add, you can use ``Any``, but beware:
- **One of the values involved has type ``Any``.** Extending the above
example, if we were to leave out the annotation for ``a``, we'd get
no error:
.. code-block:: python
def foo(a) -> str:
return '(' + a.split() + ')' # No error!
The reason is that if the type of ``a`` is unknown, the type of
``a.split()`` is also unknown, so it is inferred as having type
``Any``, and it is no error to add a string to an ``Any``.
If you're having trouble debugging such situations,
:ref:`reveal_type() <reveal-type>` might come in handy.
Note that sometimes library stubs have imprecise type information,
e.g. the ``pow()`` builtin returns ``Any`` (see `typeshed issue 285
<https://github.com/python/typeshed/issues/285>`_ for the reason).
- **Some imports may be silently ignored**. Another source of
unexpected ``Any`` values are the :ref:`"--ignore-missing-imports"
<ignore-missing-imports>` and :ref:`"--follow-imports=skip"
<follow-imports>` flags. When you use ``--ignore-missing-imports``,
any imported module that cannot be found is silently replaced with
``Any``. When using ``--follow-imports=skip`` the same is true for
modules for which a ``.py`` file is found but that are not specified
on the command line. (If a ``.pyi`` stub is found it is always
processed normally, regardless of the value of
``--follow-imports``.) To help debug the former situation (no
module found at all) leave out ``--ignore-missing-imports``; to get
clarity about the latter use ``--follow-imports=error``. You can
read up about these and other useful flags in :ref:`command-line`.
.. _silencing_checker:
Spurious errors and locally silencing the checker
-------------------------------------------------
You can use a ``# type: ignore`` comment to silence the type checker
on a particular line. For example, let's say our code is using
the C extension module ``frobnicate``, and there's no stub available.
Mypy will complain about this, as it has no information about the
module:
.. code-block:: python
import frobnicate # Error: No module "frobnicate"
frobnicate.start()
You can add a ``# type: ignore`` comment to tell mypy to ignore this
error:
.. code-block:: python
import frobnicate # type: ignore
frobnicate.start() # Okay!
The second line is now fine, since the ignore comment causes the name
``frobnicate`` to get an implicit ``Any`` type.
.. note::
The ``# type: ignore`` comment will only assign the implicit ``Any``
type if mypy cannot find information about that particular module. So,
if we did have a stub available for ``frobnicate`` then mypy would
ignore the ``# type: ignore`` comment and typecheck the stub as usual.
Types of empty collections
--------------------------
You often need to specify the type when you assign an empty list or
dict to a new variable, as mentioned earlier:
.. code-block:: python
a = [] # type: List[int]
Without the annotation mypy can't always figure out the
precise type of ``a``.
You can use a simple empty list literal in a dynamically typed function (as the
type of ``a`` would be implicitly ``Any`` and need not be inferred), if type
of the variable has been declared or inferred before, or if you perform a simple
modification operation in the same scope (such as ``append`` for a list):
.. code-block:: python
a = [] # Okay because followed by append, inferred type List[int]
for i in range(n):
a.append(i * i)
However, in more complex cases an explicit type annotation can be
required (mypy will tell you this). Often the annotation can
make your code easier to understand, so it doesn't only help mypy but
everybody who is reading the code!
Redefinitions with incompatible types
-------------------------------------
Each name within a function only has a single 'declared' type. You can
reuse for loop indices etc., but if you want to use a variable with
multiple types within a single function, you may need to declare it
with the ``Any`` type.
.. code-block:: python
def f() -> None:
n = 1
...
n = 'x' # Type error: n has type int
.. note::
This limitation could be lifted in a future mypy
release.
Note that you can redefine a variable with a more *precise* or a more
concrete type. For example, you can redefine a sequence (which does
not support ``sort()``) as a list and sort it in-place:
.. code-block:: python
def f(x: Sequence[int]) -> None:
# Type of x is Sequence[int] here; we don't know the concrete type.
x = list(x)
# Type of x is List[int] here.
x.sort() # Okay!
Declaring a supertype as variable type
--------------------------------------
Sometimes the inferred type is a subtype (subclass) of the desired
type. The type inference uses the first assignment to infer the type
of a name (assume here that ``Shape`` is the base class of both
``Circle`` and ``Triangle``):
.. code-block:: python
shape = Circle() # Infer shape to be Circle
...
shape = Triangle() # Type error: Triangle is not a Circle
You can just give an explicit type for the variable in cases such the
above example:
.. code-block:: python
shape = Circle() # type: Shape # The variable s can be any Shape,
# not just Circle
...
shape = Triangle() # OK
Complex type tests
------------------
Mypy can usually infer the types correctly when using ``isinstance()``
type tests, but for other kinds of checks you may need to add an
explicit type cast:
.. code-block:: python
def f(o: object) -> None:
if type(o) is int:
o = cast(int, o)
g(o + 1) # This would be an error without the cast
...
else:
...
.. note::
Note that the ``object`` type used in the above example is similar
to ``Object`` in Java: it only supports operations defined for *all*
objects, such as equality and ``isinstance()``. The type ``Any``,
in contrast, supports all operations, even if they may fail at
runtime. The cast above would have been unnecessary if the type of
``o`` was ``Any``.
Mypy can't infer the type of ``o`` after the ``type()`` check
because it only knows about ``isinstance()`` (and the latter is better
style anyway). We can write the above code without a cast by using
``isinstance()``:
.. code-block:: python
def f(o: object) -> None:
if isinstance(o, int): # Mypy understands isinstance checks
g(o + 1) # Okay; type of o is inferred as int here
...
Type inference in mypy is designed to work well in common cases, to be
predictable and to let the type checker give useful error
messages. More powerful type inference strategies often have complex
and difficult-to-predict failure modes and could result in very
confusing error messages. The tradeoff is that you as a programmer
sometimes have to give the type checker a little help.
.. _version_and_platform_checks:
Python version and system platform checks
-----------------------------------------
Mypy supports the ability to perform Python version checks and platform
checks (e.g. Windows vs Posix), ignoring code paths that won't be run on
the targeted Python version or platform. This allows you to more effectively
typecheck code that supports multiple versions of Python or multiple operating
systems.
More specifically, mypy will understand the use of ``sys.version_info`` and
``sys.platform`` checks within ``if/elif/else`` statements. For example:
.. code-block:: python
import sys
# Distinguishing between different versions of Python:
if sys.version_info >= (3, 5):
# Python 3.5+ specific definitions and imports
elif sys.version_info[0] >= 3:
# Python 3 specific definitions and imports
else:
# Python 2 specific definitions and imports
# Distinguishing between different operating systems:
if sys.platform.startswith("linux"):
# Linux-specific code
elif sys.platform == "darwin":
# Mac-specific code
elif sys.platform == "win32":
# Windows-specific code
else:
# Other systems
.. note::
Mypy currently does not support more complex checks, and does not assign
any special meaning when assigning a ``sys.version_info`` or ``sys.platform``
check to a variable. This may change in future versions of mypy.
By default, mypy will use your current version of Python and your current
operating system as default values for ``sys.version_info`` and
``sys.platform``.
To target a different Python version, use the ``--python-version X.Y`` flag.
For example, to verify your code typechecks if were run using Python 2, pass
in ``--python-version 2.7`` from the command line. Note that you do not need
to have Python 2.7 installed to perform this check.
To target a different operating system, use the ``--platform PLATFORM`` flag.
For example, to verify your code typechecks if it were run in Windows, pass
in ``--platform win32``. See the documentation for
`sys.platform <https://docs.python.org/3/library/sys.html#sys.platform>`_
for examples of valid platform parameters.
.. _reveal-type:
Displaying the type of an expression
------------------------------------
You can use ``reveal_type(expr)`` to ask mypy to display the inferred
static type of an expression. This can be useful when you don't quite
understand how mypy handles a particular piece of code. Example:
.. code-block:: python
reveal_type((1, 'hello')) # Revealed type is 'Tuple[builtins.int, builtins.str]'
.. note::
``reveal_type`` is only understood by mypy and doesn't exist
in Python, if you try to run your program. You'll have to remove
any ``reveal_type`` calls before you can run your code.
``reveal_type`` is always available and you don't need to import it.
.. _import-cycles:
Import cycles
-------------
An import cycle occurs where module A imports module B and module B
imports module A (perhaps indirectly, e.g. ``A -> B -> C -> A``).
Sometimes in order to add type annotations you have to add extra
imports to a module and those imports cause cycles that didn't exist
before. If those cycles become a problem when running your program,
there's a trick: if the import is only needed for type annotations in
forward references (string literals) or comments, you can write the
imports inside ``if TYPE_CHECKING:`` so that they are not executed at runtime.
Example:
File ``foo.py``:
.. code-block:: python
from typing import List, TYPE_CHECKING
if TYPE_CHECKING:
import bar
def listify(arg: 'bar.BarClass') -> 'List[bar.BarClass]':
return [arg]
File ``bar.py``:
.. code-block:: python
from typing import List
from foo import listify
class BarClass:
def listifyme(self) -> 'List[BarClass]':
return listify(self)
.. note::
The ``TYPE_CHECKING`` constant defined by the ``typing`` module
is ``False`` at runtime but ``True`` while type checking.
Python 3.5.1 doesn't have ``typing.TYPE_CHECKING``. An alternative is
to define a constant named ``MYPY`` that has the value ``False``
at runtime. Mypy considers it to be ``True`` when type checking.
Here's the above example modified to use ``MYPY``:
.. code-block:: python
from typing import List
MYPY = False
if MYPY:
import bar
def listify(arg: 'bar.BarClass') -> 'List[bar.BarClass]':
return [arg]