blob: cb581e7272d924c7b971a060996abd916246989f [file] [edit]
/-
Copyright (c) 2014 Microsoft Corporation. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Author: Leonardo de Moura
-/
prelude
import Init.SizeOf
import Init.Data.Nat.Basic
universe u v
/--
`Acc` is the accessibility predicate. Given some relation `r` (e.g. `<`) and a value `x`,
`Acc r x` means that `x` is accessible through `r`:
`x` is accessible if there exists no infinite sequence `... < y₂ < y₁ < y₀ < x`.
-/
inductive Acc {α : Sort u} (r : α → α → Prop) : α → Prop where
/--
A value is accessible if for all `y` such that `r y x`, `y` is also accessible.
Note that if there exists no `y` such that `r y x`, then `x` is accessible. Such an `x` is called a
_base case_.
-/
| intro (x : α) (h : (y : α) → r y x → Acc r y) : Acc r x
noncomputable abbrev Acc.ndrec.{u1, u2} {α : Sort u2} {r : α → α → Prop} {C : α → Sort u1}
(m : (x : α) → ((y : α) → r y x → Acc r y) → ((y : α) → (a : r y x) → C y) → C x)
{a : α} (n : Acc r a) : C a :=
n.rec m
noncomputable abbrev Acc.ndrecOn.{u1, u2} {α : Sort u2} {r : α → α → Prop} {C : α → Sort u1}
{a : α} (n : Acc r a)
(m : (x : α) → ((y : α) → r y x → Acc r y) → ((y : α) → (a : r y x) → C y) → C x)
: C a :=
n.rec m
namespace Acc
variable {α : Sort u} {r : α → α → Prop}
theorem inv {x y : α} (h₁ : Acc r x) (h₂ : r y x) : Acc r y :=
h₁.recOn (fun _ ac₁ _ h₂ => ac₁ y h₂) h₂
end Acc
/--
A relation `r` is `WellFounded` if all elements of `α` are accessible within `r`.
If a relation is `WellFounded`, it does not allow for an infinite descent along the relation.
If the arguments of the recursive calls in a function definition decrease according to
a well founded relation, then the function terminates.
Well-founded relations are sometimes called _Artinian_ or said to satisfy the “descending chain condition”.
-/
inductive WellFounded {α : Sort u} (r : α → α → Prop) : Prop where
| intro (h : ∀ a, Acc r a) : WellFounded r
class WellFoundedRelation (α : Sort u) where
rel : α → α → Prop
wf : WellFounded rel
namespace WellFounded
theorem apply {α : Sort u} {r : α → α → Prop} (wf : WellFounded r) (a : α) : Acc r a :=
wf.rec (fun p => p) a
section
variable {α : Sort u} {r : α → α → Prop} (hwf : WellFounded r)
noncomputable def recursion {C : α → Sort v} (a : α) (h : ∀ x, (∀ y, r y x → C y) → C x) : C a := by
induction (apply hwf a) with
| intro x₁ _ ih => exact h x₁ ih
include hwf in
theorem induction {C : α → Prop} (a : α) (h : ∀ x, (∀ y, r y x → C y) → C x) : C a :=
recursion hwf a h
variable {C : α → Sort v}
variable (F : ∀ x, (∀ y, r y x → C y) → C x)
noncomputable def fixF (x : α) (a : Acc r x) : C x := by
induction a with
| intro x₁ _ ih => exact F x₁ ih
theorem fixFEq (x : α) (acx : Acc r x) : fixF F x acx = F x (fun (y : α) (p : r y x) => fixF F y (Acc.inv acx p)) := by
induction acx with
| intro x r _ => exact rfl
end
variable {α : Sort u} {C : α → Sort v} {r : α → α → Prop}
-- Well-founded fixpoint
noncomputable def fix (hwf : WellFounded r) (F : ∀ x, (∀ y, r y x → C y) → C x) (x : α) : C x :=
fixF F x (apply hwf x)
-- Well-founded fixpoint satisfies fixpoint equation
theorem fix_eq (hwf : WellFounded r) (F : ∀ x, (∀ y, r y x → C y) → C x) (x : α) :
fix hwf F x = F x (fun y _ => fix hwf F y) :=
fixFEq F x (apply hwf x)
end WellFounded
open WellFounded
-- Empty relation is well-founded
def emptyWf {α : Sort u} : WellFoundedRelation α where
rel := emptyRelation
wf := by
apply WellFounded.intro
intro a
apply Acc.intro a
intro b h
cases h
-- Subrelation of a well-founded relation is well-founded
namespace Subrelation
variable {α : Sort u} {r q : α → α → Prop}
theorem accessible {a : α} (h₁ : Subrelation q r) (ac : Acc r a) : Acc q a := by
induction ac with
| intro x _ ih =>
apply Acc.intro
intro y h
exact ih y (h₁ h)
theorem wf (h₁ : Subrelation q r) (h₂ : WellFounded r) : WellFounded q :=
⟨fun a => accessible @h₁ (apply h₂ a)⟩
end Subrelation
-- The inverse image of a well-founded relation is well-founded
namespace InvImage
variable {α : Sort u} {β : Sort v} {r : β → β → Prop}
private def accAux (f : α → β) {b : β} (ac : Acc r b) : (x : α) → f x = b → Acc (InvImage r f) x := by
induction ac with
| intro x acx ih =>
intro z e
apply Acc.intro
intro y lt
subst x
apply ih (f y) lt y rfl
theorem accessible {a : α} (f : α → β) (ac : Acc r (f a)) : Acc (InvImage r f) a :=
accAux f ac a rfl
theorem wf (f : α → β) (h : WellFounded r) : WellFounded (InvImage r f) :=
⟨fun a => accessible f (apply h (f a))⟩
end InvImage
@[reducible] def invImage (f : α → β) (h : WellFoundedRelation β) : WellFoundedRelation α where
rel := InvImage h.rel f
wf := InvImage.wf f h.wf
-- The transitive closure of a well-founded relation is well-founded
open Relation
theorem Acc.transGen (h : Acc r a) : Acc (TransGen r) a := by
induction h with
| intro x _ H =>
refine Acc.intro x fun y hy ↦ ?_
cases hy with
| single hyx =>
exact H y hyx
| tail hyz hzx =>
exact (H _ hzx).inv hyz
theorem acc_transGen_iff : Acc (TransGen r) a ↔ Acc r a :=
⟨Subrelation.accessible TransGen.single, Acc.transGen⟩
theorem WellFounded.transGen (h : WellFounded r) : WellFounded (TransGen r) :=
⟨fun a ↦ (h.apply a).transGen⟩
@[deprecated Acc.transGen (since := "2024-07-16")] abbrev TC.accessible := @Acc.transGen
@[deprecated WellFounded.transGen (since := "2024-07-16")] abbrev TC.wf := @WellFounded.transGen
namespace Nat
-- less-than is well-founded
def lt_wfRel : WellFoundedRelation Nat where
rel := (· < ·)
wf := by
apply WellFounded.intro
intro n
induction n with
| zero =>
apply Acc.intro 0
intro _ h
apply absurd h (Nat.not_lt_zero _)
| succ n ih =>
apply Acc.intro (Nat.succ n)
intro m h
have : m = n ∨ m < n := Nat.eq_or_lt_of_le (Nat.le_of_succ_le_succ h)
match this with
| Or.inl e => subst e; assumption
| Or.inr e => exact Acc.inv ih e
@[elab_as_elim] protected noncomputable def strongRecOn
{motive : Nat → Sort u}
(n : Nat)
(ind : ∀ n, (∀ m, m < n → motive m) → motive n) : motive n :=
Nat.lt_wfRel.wf.fix ind n
@[deprecated Nat.strongRecOn (since := "2024-08-27")]
protected noncomputable def strongInductionOn
{motive : Nat → Sort u}
(n : Nat)
(ind : ∀ n, (∀ m, m < n → motive m) → motive n) : motive n :=
Nat.strongRecOn n ind
@[elab_as_elim] protected noncomputable def caseStrongRecOn
{motive : Nat → Sort u}
(a : Nat)
(zero : motive 0)
(ind : ∀ n, (∀ m, m ≤ n → motive m) → motive (succ n)) : motive a :=
Nat.strongRecOn a fun n =>
match n with
| 0 => fun _ => zero
| n+1 => fun h₁ => ind n (λ _ h₂ => h₁ _ (lt_succ_of_le h₂))
@[deprecated Nat.caseStrongRecOn (since := "2024-08-27")]
protected noncomputable def caseStrongInductionOn
{motive : Nat → Sort u}
(a : Nat)
(zero : motive 0)
(ind : ∀ n, (∀ m, m ≤ n → motive m) → motive (succ n)) : motive a :=
Nat.caseStrongRecOn a zero ind
end Nat
abbrev measure {α : Sort u} (f : α → Nat) : WellFoundedRelation α :=
invImage f Nat.lt_wfRel
abbrev sizeOfWFRel {α : Sort u} [SizeOf α] : WellFoundedRelation α :=
measure sizeOf
instance (priority := low) [SizeOf α] : WellFoundedRelation α :=
sizeOfWFRel
namespace Prod
open WellFounded
section
variable {α : Type u} {β : Type v}
variable (ra : α → α → Prop)
variable (rb : β → β → Prop)
-- Lexicographical order based on ra and rb
protected inductive Lex : α × β → α × β → Prop where
| left {a₁} (b₁) {a₂} (b₂) (h : ra a₁ a₂) : Prod.Lex (a₁, b₁) (a₂, b₂)
| right (a) {b₁ b₂} (h : rb b₁ b₂) : Prod.Lex (a, b₁) (a, b₂)
theorem lex_def {r : α → α → Prop} {s : β → β → Prop} {p q : α × β} :
Prod.Lex r s p q ↔ r p.1 q.1 ∨ p.1 = q.1 ∧ s p.2 q.2 :=
⟨fun h => by cases h <;> simp [*], fun h =>
match p, q, h with
| (a, b), (c, d), Or.inl h => Lex.left _ _ h
| (a, b), (c, d), Or.inr ⟨e, h⟩ => by subst e; exact Lex.right _ h⟩
namespace Lex
instance [αeqDec : DecidableEq α] {r : α → α → Prop} [rDec : DecidableRel r]
{s : β → β → Prop} [sDec : DecidableRel s] : DecidableRel (Prod.Lex r s)
| (a, b), (a', b') =>
match rDec a a' with
| isTrue raa' => isTrue $ left b b' raa'
| isFalse nraa' =>
match αeqDec a a' with
| isTrue eq => by
subst eq
cases sDec b b' with
| isTrue sbb' => exact isTrue $ right a sbb'
| isFalse nsbb' =>
apply isFalse; intro contra; cases contra <;> contradiction
| isFalse neqaa' => by
apply isFalse; intro contra; cases contra <;> contradiction
-- TODO: generalize
theorem right' {a₁ : Nat} {b₁ : β} (h₁ : a₁ ≤ a₂) (h₂ : rb b₁ b₂) : Prod.Lex Nat.lt rb (a₁, b₁) (a₂, b₂) :=
match Nat.eq_or_lt_of_le h₁ with
| Or.inl h => h ▸ Prod.Lex.right a₁ h₂
| Or.inr h => Prod.Lex.left b₁ _ h
end Lex
-- relational product based on ra and rb
inductive RProd : α × β → α × β → Prop where
| intro {a₁ b₁ a₂ b₂} (h₁ : ra a₁ a₂) (h₂ : rb b₁ b₂) : RProd (a₁, b₁) (a₂, b₂)
end
section
variable {α : Type u} {β : Type v}
variable {ra : α → α → Prop} {rb : β → β → Prop}
theorem lexAccessible {a : α} (aca : Acc ra a) (acb : (b : β) → Acc rb b) (b : β) : Acc (Prod.Lex ra rb) (a, b) := by
induction aca generalizing b with
| intro xa _ iha =>
induction (acb b) with
| intro xb _ ihb =>
apply Acc.intro (xa, xb)
intro p lt
cases lt with
| left _ _ h => apply iha _ h
| right _ h => apply ihb _ h
-- The lexicographical order of well founded relations is well-founded
@[reducible] def lex (ha : WellFoundedRelation α) (hb : WellFoundedRelation β) : WellFoundedRelation (α × β) where
rel := Prod.Lex ha.rel hb.rel
wf := ⟨fun (a, b) => lexAccessible (WellFounded.apply ha.wf a) (WellFounded.apply hb.wf) b⟩
instance [ha : WellFoundedRelation α] [hb : WellFoundedRelation β] : WellFoundedRelation (α × β) :=
lex ha hb
-- relational product is a Subrelation of the Lex
theorem RProdSubLex (a : α × β) (b : α × β) (h : RProd ra rb a b) : Prod.Lex ra rb a b := by
cases h with
| intro h₁ h₂ => exact Prod.Lex.left _ _ h₁
-- The relational product of well founded relations is well-founded
def rprod (ha : WellFoundedRelation α) (hb : WellFoundedRelation β) : WellFoundedRelation (α × β) where
rel := RProd ha.rel hb.rel
wf := by
apply Subrelation.wf (r := Prod.Lex ha.rel hb.rel) (h₂ := (lex ha hb).wf)
intro a b h
exact RProdSubLex a b h
end
end Prod
namespace PSigma
section
variable {α : Sort u} {β : α → Sort v}
variable (r : α → α → Prop)
variable (s : ∀ a, β a → β a → Prop)
-- Lexicographical order based on r and s
inductive Lex : PSigma β → PSigma β → Prop where
| left : ∀ {a₁ : α} (b₁ : β a₁) {a₂ : α} (b₂ : β a₂), r a₁ a₂ → Lex ⟨a₁, b₁⟩ ⟨a₂, b₂⟩
| right : ∀ (a : α) {b₁ b₂ : β a}, s a b₁ b₂ → Lex ⟨a, b₁⟩ ⟨a, b₂⟩
end
section
variable {α : Sort u} {β : α → Sort v}
variable {r : α → α → Prop} {s : ∀ (a : α), β a → β a → Prop}
theorem lexAccessible {a} (aca : Acc r a) (acb : (a : α) → WellFounded (s a)) (b : β a) : Acc (Lex r s) ⟨a, b⟩ := by
induction aca with
| intro xa _ iha =>
induction (WellFounded.apply (acb xa) b) with
| intro xb _ ihb =>
apply Acc.intro
intro p lt
cases lt with
| left => apply iha; assumption
| right => apply ihb; assumption
-- The lexicographical order of well founded relations is well-founded
@[reducible] def lex (ha : WellFoundedRelation α) (hb : (a : α) → WellFoundedRelation (β a)) : WellFoundedRelation (PSigma β) where
rel := Lex ha.rel (fun a => hb a |>.rel)
wf := WellFounded.intro fun ⟨a, b⟩ => lexAccessible (WellFounded.apply ha.wf a) (fun a => hb a |>.wf) b
instance [ha : WellFoundedRelation α] [hb : (a : α) → WellFoundedRelation (β a)] : WellFoundedRelation (PSigma β) :=
lex ha hb
end
section
variable {α : Sort u} {β : Sort v}
def lexNdep (r : α → α → Prop) (s : β → β → Prop) :=
Lex r (fun _ => s)
theorem lexNdepWf {r : α → α → Prop} {s : β → β → Prop} (ha : WellFounded r) (hb : WellFounded s) : WellFounded (lexNdep r s) :=
WellFounded.intro fun ⟨a, b⟩ => lexAccessible (WellFounded.apply ha a) (fun _ => hb) b
end
section
variable {α : Sort u} {β : Sort v}
-- Reverse lexicographical order based on r and s
inductive RevLex (r : α → α → Prop) (s : β → β → Prop) : @PSigma α (fun _ => β) → @PSigma α (fun _ => β) → Prop where
| left : {a₁ a₂ : α} → (b : β) → r a₁ a₂ → RevLex r s ⟨a₁, b⟩ ⟨a₂, b⟩
| right : (a₁ : α) → {b₁ : β} → (a₂ : α) → {b₂ : β} → s b₁ b₂ → RevLex r s ⟨a₁, b₁⟩ ⟨a₂, b₂⟩
end
section
open WellFounded
variable {α : Sort u} {β : Sort v}
variable {r : α → α → Prop} {s : β → β → Prop}
theorem revLexAccessible {b} (acb : Acc s b) (aca : (a : α) → Acc r a): (a : α) → Acc (RevLex r s) ⟨a, b⟩ := by
induction acb with
| intro xb _ ihb =>
intro a
induction (aca a) with
| intro xa _ iha =>
apply Acc.intro
intro p lt
cases lt with
| left => apply iha; assumption
| right => apply ihb; assumption
theorem revLex (ha : WellFounded r) (hb : WellFounded s) : WellFounded (RevLex r s) :=
WellFounded.intro fun ⟨a, b⟩ => revLexAccessible (apply hb b) (WellFounded.apply ha) a
end
section
def SkipLeft (α : Type u) {β : Type v} (s : β → β → Prop) : @PSigma α (fun _ => β) → @PSigma α (fun _ => β) → Prop :=
RevLex emptyRelation s
def skipLeft (α : Type u) {β : Type v} (hb : WellFoundedRelation β) : WellFoundedRelation (PSigma fun _ : α => β) where
rel := SkipLeft α hb.rel
wf := revLex emptyWf.wf hb.wf
theorem mkSkipLeft {α : Type u} {β : Type v} {b₁ b₂ : β} {s : β → β → Prop} (a₁ a₂ : α) (h : s b₁ b₂) : SkipLeft α s ⟨a₁, b₁⟩ ⟨a₂, b₂⟩ :=
RevLex.right _ _ h
end
end PSigma