| /- | |
| Copyright (c) 2014 Microsoft Corporation. All rights reserved. | |
| Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE. | |
| Author: Leonardo de Moura | |
| -/ | |
| prelude | |
| import Init.SizeOf | |
| import Init.Data.Nat.Basic | |
| universe u v | |
| /-- | |
| `Acc` is the accessibility predicate. Given some relation `r` (e.g. `<`) and a value `x`, | |
| `Acc r x` means that `x` is accessible through `r`: | |
| `x` is accessible if there exists no infinite sequence `... < y₂ < y₁ < y₀ < x`. | |
| -/ | |
| inductive Acc {α : Sort u} (r : α → α → Prop) : α → Prop where | |
| /-- | |
| A value is accessible if for all `y` such that `r y x`, `y` is also accessible. | |
| Note that if there exists no `y` such that `r y x`, then `x` is accessible. Such an `x` is called a | |
| _base case_. | |
| -/ | |
| | intro (x : α) (h : (y : α) → r y x → Acc r y) : Acc r x | |
| noncomputable abbrev Acc.ndrec.{u1, u2} {α : Sort u2} {r : α → α → Prop} {C : α → Sort u1} | |
| (m : (x : α) → ((y : α) → r y x → Acc r y) → ((y : α) → (a : r y x) → C y) → C x) | |
| {a : α} (n : Acc r a) : C a := | |
| n.rec m | |
| noncomputable abbrev Acc.ndrecOn.{u1, u2} {α : Sort u2} {r : α → α → Prop} {C : α → Sort u1} | |
| {a : α} (n : Acc r a) | |
| (m : (x : α) → ((y : α) → r y x → Acc r y) → ((y : α) → (a : r y x) → C y) → C x) | |
| : C a := | |
| n.rec m | |
| namespace Acc | |
| variable {α : Sort u} {r : α → α → Prop} | |
| theorem inv {x y : α} (h₁ : Acc r x) (h₂ : r y x) : Acc r y := | |
| h₁.recOn (fun _ ac₁ _ h₂ => ac₁ y h₂) h₂ | |
| end Acc | |
| /-- | |
| A relation `r` is `WellFounded` if all elements of `α` are accessible within `r`. | |
| If a relation is `WellFounded`, it does not allow for an infinite descent along the relation. | |
| If the arguments of the recursive calls in a function definition decrease according to | |
| a well founded relation, then the function terminates. | |
| Well-founded relations are sometimes called _Artinian_ or said to satisfy the “descending chain condition”. | |
| -/ | |
| inductive WellFounded {α : Sort u} (r : α → α → Prop) : Prop where | |
| | intro (h : ∀ a, Acc r a) : WellFounded r | |
| class WellFoundedRelation (α : Sort u) where | |
| rel : α → α → Prop | |
| wf : WellFounded rel | |
| namespace WellFounded | |
| theorem apply {α : Sort u} {r : α → α → Prop} (wf : WellFounded r) (a : α) : Acc r a := | |
| wf.rec (fun p => p) a | |
| section | |
| variable {α : Sort u} {r : α → α → Prop} (hwf : WellFounded r) | |
| noncomputable def recursion {C : α → Sort v} (a : α) (h : ∀ x, (∀ y, r y x → C y) → C x) : C a := by | |
| induction (apply hwf a) with | |
| | intro x₁ _ ih => exact h x₁ ih | |
| include hwf in | |
| theorem induction {C : α → Prop} (a : α) (h : ∀ x, (∀ y, r y x → C y) → C x) : C a := | |
| recursion hwf a h | |
| variable {C : α → Sort v} | |
| variable (F : ∀ x, (∀ y, r y x → C y) → C x) | |
| noncomputable def fixF (x : α) (a : Acc r x) : C x := by | |
| induction a with | |
| | intro x₁ _ ih => exact F x₁ ih | |
| theorem fixFEq (x : α) (acx : Acc r x) : fixF F x acx = F x (fun (y : α) (p : r y x) => fixF F y (Acc.inv acx p)) := by | |
| induction acx with | |
| | intro x r _ => exact rfl | |
| end | |
| variable {α : Sort u} {C : α → Sort v} {r : α → α → Prop} | |
| -- Well-founded fixpoint | |
| noncomputable def fix (hwf : WellFounded r) (F : ∀ x, (∀ y, r y x → C y) → C x) (x : α) : C x := | |
| fixF F x (apply hwf x) | |
| -- Well-founded fixpoint satisfies fixpoint equation | |
| theorem fix_eq (hwf : WellFounded r) (F : ∀ x, (∀ y, r y x → C y) → C x) (x : α) : | |
| fix hwf F x = F x (fun y _ => fix hwf F y) := | |
| fixFEq F x (apply hwf x) | |
| end WellFounded | |
| open WellFounded | |
| -- Empty relation is well-founded | |
| def emptyWf {α : Sort u} : WellFoundedRelation α where | |
| rel := emptyRelation | |
| wf := by | |
| apply WellFounded.intro | |
| intro a | |
| apply Acc.intro a | |
| intro b h | |
| cases h | |
| -- Subrelation of a well-founded relation is well-founded | |
| namespace Subrelation | |
| variable {α : Sort u} {r q : α → α → Prop} | |
| theorem accessible {a : α} (h₁ : Subrelation q r) (ac : Acc r a) : Acc q a := by | |
| induction ac with | |
| | intro x _ ih => | |
| apply Acc.intro | |
| intro y h | |
| exact ih y (h₁ h) | |
| theorem wf (h₁ : Subrelation q r) (h₂ : WellFounded r) : WellFounded q := | |
| ⟨fun a => accessible @h₁ (apply h₂ a)⟩ | |
| end Subrelation | |
| -- The inverse image of a well-founded relation is well-founded | |
| namespace InvImage | |
| variable {α : Sort u} {β : Sort v} {r : β → β → Prop} | |
| private def accAux (f : α → β) {b : β} (ac : Acc r b) : (x : α) → f x = b → Acc (InvImage r f) x := by | |
| induction ac with | |
| | intro x acx ih => | |
| intro z e | |
| apply Acc.intro | |
| intro y lt | |
| subst x | |
| apply ih (f y) lt y rfl | |
| theorem accessible {a : α} (f : α → β) (ac : Acc r (f a)) : Acc (InvImage r f) a := | |
| accAux f ac a rfl | |
| theorem wf (f : α → β) (h : WellFounded r) : WellFounded (InvImage r f) := | |
| ⟨fun a => accessible f (apply h (f a))⟩ | |
| end InvImage | |
| @[reducible] def invImage (f : α → β) (h : WellFoundedRelation β) : WellFoundedRelation α where | |
| rel := InvImage h.rel f | |
| wf := InvImage.wf f h.wf | |
| -- The transitive closure of a well-founded relation is well-founded | |
| open Relation | |
| theorem Acc.transGen (h : Acc r a) : Acc (TransGen r) a := by | |
| induction h with | |
| | intro x _ H => | |
| refine Acc.intro x fun y hy ↦ ?_ | |
| cases hy with | |
| | single hyx => | |
| exact H y hyx | |
| | tail hyz hzx => | |
| exact (H _ hzx).inv hyz | |
| theorem acc_transGen_iff : Acc (TransGen r) a ↔ Acc r a := | |
| ⟨Subrelation.accessible TransGen.single, Acc.transGen⟩ | |
| theorem WellFounded.transGen (h : WellFounded r) : WellFounded (TransGen r) := | |
| ⟨fun a ↦ (h.apply a).transGen⟩ | |
| @[deprecated Acc.transGen (since := "2024-07-16")] abbrev TC.accessible := @Acc.transGen | |
| @[deprecated WellFounded.transGen (since := "2024-07-16")] abbrev TC.wf := @WellFounded.transGen | |
| namespace Nat | |
| -- less-than is well-founded | |
| def lt_wfRel : WellFoundedRelation Nat where | |
| rel := (· < ·) | |
| wf := by | |
| apply WellFounded.intro | |
| intro n | |
| induction n with | |
| | zero => | |
| apply Acc.intro 0 | |
| intro _ h | |
| apply absurd h (Nat.not_lt_zero _) | |
| | succ n ih => | |
| apply Acc.intro (Nat.succ n) | |
| intro m h | |
| have : m = n ∨ m < n := Nat.eq_or_lt_of_le (Nat.le_of_succ_le_succ h) | |
| match this with | |
| | Or.inl e => subst e; assumption | |
| | Or.inr e => exact Acc.inv ih e | |
| @[elab_as_elim] protected noncomputable def strongRecOn | |
| {motive : Nat → Sort u} | |
| (n : Nat) | |
| (ind : ∀ n, (∀ m, m < n → motive m) → motive n) : motive n := | |
| Nat.lt_wfRel.wf.fix ind n | |
| @[deprecated Nat.strongRecOn (since := "2024-08-27")] | |
| protected noncomputable def strongInductionOn | |
| {motive : Nat → Sort u} | |
| (n : Nat) | |
| (ind : ∀ n, (∀ m, m < n → motive m) → motive n) : motive n := | |
| Nat.strongRecOn n ind | |
| @[elab_as_elim] protected noncomputable def caseStrongRecOn | |
| {motive : Nat → Sort u} | |
| (a : Nat) | |
| (zero : motive 0) | |
| (ind : ∀ n, (∀ m, m ≤ n → motive m) → motive (succ n)) : motive a := | |
| Nat.strongRecOn a fun n => | |
| match n with | |
| | 0 => fun _ => zero | |
| | n+1 => fun h₁ => ind n (λ _ h₂ => h₁ _ (lt_succ_of_le h₂)) | |
| @[deprecated Nat.caseStrongRecOn (since := "2024-08-27")] | |
| protected noncomputable def caseStrongInductionOn | |
| {motive : Nat → Sort u} | |
| (a : Nat) | |
| (zero : motive 0) | |
| (ind : ∀ n, (∀ m, m ≤ n → motive m) → motive (succ n)) : motive a := | |
| Nat.caseStrongRecOn a zero ind | |
| end Nat | |
| abbrev measure {α : Sort u} (f : α → Nat) : WellFoundedRelation α := | |
| invImage f Nat.lt_wfRel | |
| abbrev sizeOfWFRel {α : Sort u} [SizeOf α] : WellFoundedRelation α := | |
| measure sizeOf | |
| instance (priority := low) [SizeOf α] : WellFoundedRelation α := | |
| sizeOfWFRel | |
| namespace Prod | |
| open WellFounded | |
| section | |
| variable {α : Type u} {β : Type v} | |
| variable (ra : α → α → Prop) | |
| variable (rb : β → β → Prop) | |
| -- Lexicographical order based on ra and rb | |
| protected inductive Lex : α × β → α × β → Prop where | |
| | left {a₁} (b₁) {a₂} (b₂) (h : ra a₁ a₂) : Prod.Lex (a₁, b₁) (a₂, b₂) | |
| | right (a) {b₁ b₂} (h : rb b₁ b₂) : Prod.Lex (a, b₁) (a, b₂) | |
| theorem lex_def {r : α → α → Prop} {s : β → β → Prop} {p q : α × β} : | |
| Prod.Lex r s p q ↔ r p.1 q.1 ∨ p.1 = q.1 ∧ s p.2 q.2 := | |
| ⟨fun h => by cases h <;> simp [*], fun h => | |
| match p, q, h with | |
| | (a, b), (c, d), Or.inl h => Lex.left _ _ h | |
| | (a, b), (c, d), Or.inr ⟨e, h⟩ => by subst e; exact Lex.right _ h⟩ | |
| namespace Lex | |
| instance [αeqDec : DecidableEq α] {r : α → α → Prop} [rDec : DecidableRel r] | |
| {s : β → β → Prop} [sDec : DecidableRel s] : DecidableRel (Prod.Lex r s) | |
| | (a, b), (a', b') => | |
| match rDec a a' with | |
| | isTrue raa' => isTrue $ left b b' raa' | |
| | isFalse nraa' => | |
| match αeqDec a a' with | |
| | isTrue eq => by | |
| subst eq | |
| cases sDec b b' with | |
| | isTrue sbb' => exact isTrue $ right a sbb' | |
| | isFalse nsbb' => | |
| apply isFalse; intro contra; cases contra <;> contradiction | |
| | isFalse neqaa' => by | |
| apply isFalse; intro contra; cases contra <;> contradiction | |
| -- TODO: generalize | |
| theorem right' {a₁ : Nat} {b₁ : β} (h₁ : a₁ ≤ a₂) (h₂ : rb b₁ b₂) : Prod.Lex Nat.lt rb (a₁, b₁) (a₂, b₂) := | |
| match Nat.eq_or_lt_of_le h₁ with | |
| | Or.inl h => h ▸ Prod.Lex.right a₁ h₂ | |
| | Or.inr h => Prod.Lex.left b₁ _ h | |
| end Lex | |
| -- relational product based on ra and rb | |
| inductive RProd : α × β → α × β → Prop where | |
| | intro {a₁ b₁ a₂ b₂} (h₁ : ra a₁ a₂) (h₂ : rb b₁ b₂) : RProd (a₁, b₁) (a₂, b₂) | |
| end | |
| section | |
| variable {α : Type u} {β : Type v} | |
| variable {ra : α → α → Prop} {rb : β → β → Prop} | |
| theorem lexAccessible {a : α} (aca : Acc ra a) (acb : (b : β) → Acc rb b) (b : β) : Acc (Prod.Lex ra rb) (a, b) := by | |
| induction aca generalizing b with | |
| | intro xa _ iha => | |
| induction (acb b) with | |
| | intro xb _ ihb => | |
| apply Acc.intro (xa, xb) | |
| intro p lt | |
| cases lt with | |
| | left _ _ h => apply iha _ h | |
| | right _ h => apply ihb _ h | |
| -- The lexicographical order of well founded relations is well-founded | |
| @[reducible] def lex (ha : WellFoundedRelation α) (hb : WellFoundedRelation β) : WellFoundedRelation (α × β) where | |
| rel := Prod.Lex ha.rel hb.rel | |
| wf := ⟨fun (a, b) => lexAccessible (WellFounded.apply ha.wf a) (WellFounded.apply hb.wf) b⟩ | |
| instance [ha : WellFoundedRelation α] [hb : WellFoundedRelation β] : WellFoundedRelation (α × β) := | |
| lex ha hb | |
| -- relational product is a Subrelation of the Lex | |
| theorem RProdSubLex (a : α × β) (b : α × β) (h : RProd ra rb a b) : Prod.Lex ra rb a b := by | |
| cases h with | |
| | intro h₁ h₂ => exact Prod.Lex.left _ _ h₁ | |
| -- The relational product of well founded relations is well-founded | |
| def rprod (ha : WellFoundedRelation α) (hb : WellFoundedRelation β) : WellFoundedRelation (α × β) where | |
| rel := RProd ha.rel hb.rel | |
| wf := by | |
| apply Subrelation.wf (r := Prod.Lex ha.rel hb.rel) (h₂ := (lex ha hb).wf) | |
| intro a b h | |
| exact RProdSubLex a b h | |
| end | |
| end Prod | |
| namespace PSigma | |
| section | |
| variable {α : Sort u} {β : α → Sort v} | |
| variable (r : α → α → Prop) | |
| variable (s : ∀ a, β a → β a → Prop) | |
| -- Lexicographical order based on r and s | |
| inductive Lex : PSigma β → PSigma β → Prop where | |
| | left : ∀ {a₁ : α} (b₁ : β a₁) {a₂ : α} (b₂ : β a₂), r a₁ a₂ → Lex ⟨a₁, b₁⟩ ⟨a₂, b₂⟩ | |
| | right : ∀ (a : α) {b₁ b₂ : β a}, s a b₁ b₂ → Lex ⟨a, b₁⟩ ⟨a, b₂⟩ | |
| end | |
| section | |
| variable {α : Sort u} {β : α → Sort v} | |
| variable {r : α → α → Prop} {s : ∀ (a : α), β a → β a → Prop} | |
| theorem lexAccessible {a} (aca : Acc r a) (acb : (a : α) → WellFounded (s a)) (b : β a) : Acc (Lex r s) ⟨a, b⟩ := by | |
| induction aca with | |
| | intro xa _ iha => | |
| induction (WellFounded.apply (acb xa) b) with | |
| | intro xb _ ihb => | |
| apply Acc.intro | |
| intro p lt | |
| cases lt with | |
| | left => apply iha; assumption | |
| | right => apply ihb; assumption | |
| -- The lexicographical order of well founded relations is well-founded | |
| @[reducible] def lex (ha : WellFoundedRelation α) (hb : (a : α) → WellFoundedRelation (β a)) : WellFoundedRelation (PSigma β) where | |
| rel := Lex ha.rel (fun a => hb a |>.rel) | |
| wf := WellFounded.intro fun ⟨a, b⟩ => lexAccessible (WellFounded.apply ha.wf a) (fun a => hb a |>.wf) b | |
| instance [ha : WellFoundedRelation α] [hb : (a : α) → WellFoundedRelation (β a)] : WellFoundedRelation (PSigma β) := | |
| lex ha hb | |
| end | |
| section | |
| variable {α : Sort u} {β : Sort v} | |
| def lexNdep (r : α → α → Prop) (s : β → β → Prop) := | |
| Lex r (fun _ => s) | |
| theorem lexNdepWf {r : α → α → Prop} {s : β → β → Prop} (ha : WellFounded r) (hb : WellFounded s) : WellFounded (lexNdep r s) := | |
| WellFounded.intro fun ⟨a, b⟩ => lexAccessible (WellFounded.apply ha a) (fun _ => hb) b | |
| end | |
| section | |
| variable {α : Sort u} {β : Sort v} | |
| -- Reverse lexicographical order based on r and s | |
| inductive RevLex (r : α → α → Prop) (s : β → β → Prop) : @PSigma α (fun _ => β) → @PSigma α (fun _ => β) → Prop where | |
| | left : {a₁ a₂ : α} → (b : β) → r a₁ a₂ → RevLex r s ⟨a₁, b⟩ ⟨a₂, b⟩ | |
| | right : (a₁ : α) → {b₁ : β} → (a₂ : α) → {b₂ : β} → s b₁ b₂ → RevLex r s ⟨a₁, b₁⟩ ⟨a₂, b₂⟩ | |
| end | |
| section | |
| open WellFounded | |
| variable {α : Sort u} {β : Sort v} | |
| variable {r : α → α → Prop} {s : β → β → Prop} | |
| theorem revLexAccessible {b} (acb : Acc s b) (aca : (a : α) → Acc r a): (a : α) → Acc (RevLex r s) ⟨a, b⟩ := by | |
| induction acb with | |
| | intro xb _ ihb => | |
| intro a | |
| induction (aca a) with | |
| | intro xa _ iha => | |
| apply Acc.intro | |
| intro p lt | |
| cases lt with | |
| | left => apply iha; assumption | |
| | right => apply ihb; assumption | |
| theorem revLex (ha : WellFounded r) (hb : WellFounded s) : WellFounded (RevLex r s) := | |
| WellFounded.intro fun ⟨a, b⟩ => revLexAccessible (apply hb b) (WellFounded.apply ha) a | |
| end | |
| section | |
| def SkipLeft (α : Type u) {β : Type v} (s : β → β → Prop) : @PSigma α (fun _ => β) → @PSigma α (fun _ => β) → Prop := | |
| RevLex emptyRelation s | |
| def skipLeft (α : Type u) {β : Type v} (hb : WellFoundedRelation β) : WellFoundedRelation (PSigma fun _ : α => β) where | |
| rel := SkipLeft α hb.rel | |
| wf := revLex emptyWf.wf hb.wf | |
| theorem mkSkipLeft {α : Type u} {β : Type v} {b₁ b₂ : β} {s : β → β → Prop} (a₁ a₂ : α) (h : s b₁ b₂) : SkipLeft α s ⟨a₁, b₁⟩ ⟨a₂, b₂⟩ := | |
| RevLex.right _ _ h | |
| end | |
| end PSigma |