syzkaller uses declarative description of syscall interfaces to manipulate programs (sequences of syscalls). Below you can see (hopefully self-explanatory) excerpt from the descriptions:
open(file filename, flags flags[open_flags], mode flags[open_mode]) fd read(fd fd, buf buffer[out], count len[buf]) close(fd fd) open_mode = S_IRUSR, S_IWUSR, S_IXUSR, S_IRGRP, S_IWGRP, S_IXGRP, S_IROTH, S_IWOTH, S_IXOTH
The descriptions are contained in sys/$OS/*.txt files. For example see the sys/linux/dev_snd_midi.txt file for descriptions of the Linux MIDI interfaces.
A more formal description of the description syntax can be found here.
The translated descriptions are then used to generate, mutate, execute, minimize, serialize and deserialize programs. A program is a sequences of syscalls with concrete values for arguments. Here is an example (of a textual representation) of a program:
r0 = open(&(0x7f0000000000)="./file0", 0x3, 0x9) read(r0, &(0x7f0000000000), 42) close(r0)
For actual manipulations syzkaller uses in-memory AST-like representation consisting of Call and Arg values defined in prog/prog.go. That representation is used to analyze, generate, mutate, minimize, validate, etc programs.
The in-memory representation can be transformed to/from textual form to store in on-disk corpus, show to humans, etc.
There is also another binary representation of the programs (called exec), that is much simpler, does not contain rich type information (irreversible) and is used for actual execution (interpretation) of programs by executor.
This section describes how to extend syzkaller to allow fuzz testing of more kernel interfaces. This is particularly useful for kernel developers who are proposing new system calls.
Currently all syscall descriptions are manually-written. There is an open issue to provide some aid for this process and some ongoing work, but we are not there yet to have a fully-automated way to generate descriptions. There is a helper headerparser utility that can auto-generate some parts of descriptions from header files. Visual Studio Code has syz-lang extension for highlighting syntax.
To enable fuzzing of a new kernel interface:
Study the interface, find out which syscalls are required to use it. Sometimes there is nothing besides the source code, but here are some things that may help:
git blame or git log and reading the commit description.Using syntax documentation and existing descriptions as an example, add a declarative description of this interface to the appropriate file:
sys/linux/<subsystem>.txt files hold system calls for particular kernel subsystems, for example bpf.txt or socket.txt.sys/linux/<new>.txt file.dev_*.txt for descriptions of /dev/ devices, use socket_*.txt for sockets, etc).After adding/changing descriptions run:
make extract TARGETOS=linux SOURCEDIR=$KSRC make generate make
Run syzkaller. Make sure that the newly added interface in being reached by syzkaller using the coverage information page.
In the instructions above make extract generates/updates the *.const files. $KSRC should point to the latest kernel checkout.
Note: for Linux the latest kernel checkout generally means the mainline tree.
However, in some cases we add descriptions for interfaces that are not in the mainline tree yet, so if make extract complains about missing header files or constants undefined on all architectures, try to use the latest linux-next tree (or if it happens to be broken at the moment, try a slightly older linux-next tree).
Note: make extract overwrites .config in $KSRC and mrproper's it. Note: *.const files are checked-in with the *.txt changes in the same commit.
Then make generate updates generated code and make rebuilds binaries.
Note: make generate does not require any kernel sources, native compilers, etc and is pure text processing. Note: make generate also updates the SYZ_REVISION under executor/defs.h, which is required for machine check while running syz-manager. This should be taken care of especially if you are trying to rebase with your own change on syscall description.
Note: make extract extracts constants for all architectures which requires installed cross-compilers. If you get errors about missing compilers/libraries, try sudo make install_prerequisites or install equivalent package for your distro. Note: sudo make install_prerequisites will success even with some package failed to install, sudo apt-get update && sudo apt-get upgrade might be required to make this more efficient.
If you want to fuzz only the new subsystem that you described locally, you may find the enable_syscalls configuration parameter useful to specifically target the new system calls. All system calls in the enable_syscalls list will be enabled if their requirements are met (ie. if they are supported in the target machine and any other system calls that need to run in order to provide inputs for them are also enabled). You can also include wildcard definitions to enable multiple system calls in a single line, for example: "ioctl" will enable all the described ioctls syscalls that have their requirements met, "ioctl$UDMABUF_CREATE" enables only that particular ioctl call, "write$UHID_*" enables all write system calls that start with that description identifier.
When updating existing syzkaller descriptions, note, that unless there's a drastic change in descriptions for a particular syscall, the programs that are already in the corpus will be kept there, unless you manually clear them out (for example by removing the corpus.db file).
Stick with existing kernel names for things, don't invent new names if possible.
Following established naming conventions provides the following benefits: (1) consistency and familiarity of names used across kernel interfaces, which also enables searching kernel sources for related names; and (2) enable static checking of descriptions (e.g. missed flags or mistyped fields) with syz-check.
For example, if there is an existing enum v4l2_buf_type in the kernel headers, use this name for flags in descriptions as well. The same for structs, unions, fields, etc. For syscall and struct variants, append the variant name after the $ sign. For example, fcntl$F_GET_RW_HINT, ioctl$FIOCLEX, setsockopt$SO_TIMESTAMP.
Resources and resource directions (in, out, inout) impose implicit ordering constraints on involved syscalls.
If a syscall accepts a resource of a particular type (e.g. has fd_cdrom as an input), then it will be generally placed after a syscall that has this resource as output, so that the resource value can be passed between syscalls. For example:
r0 = openat$cdrom(...) ioctl$CDROMPAUSE(r0, 0x123) close(r0)
Syscall arguments are always in, return values are out and pointer indirections have explicit direction as ptr type attribute. Also, it is possible to specify direction attribute individually for struct fields to account for more complex producer/consumer scenarios with structs that include both input/output resources.
When specifying integer/string flags or integer fields stick with the official expected values only.
Commonly, bugs are triggered by unexpected inputs. With that in mind, it can be too tempting to introduce some unexpected values to descriptions (e.g. -1 or INT_MAX). This is not encouraged for several reasons. First, this is a cross-cutting aspect and these special unexpected values are applicable to just any flags and integer fields. Manually specifying them thousands of times is not scalable and is not maintainable. Second, It's hard for the fuzzer to come up with correct complex syscall sequences, and the descriptions are meant to help with this. Coming up with unexpected integer values is easy and the fuzzer does not need help here. Overall the idea is to improve the generic fuzzer logic to handle these cases better, which will help all descriptions, rather than over-specializing each individual integer separately. Fuzzer already has several tricks to deal with this, e.g. comparison operand value interception and list of typical magic values.
Note: some values for flags may be undocumented only as an oversight. These values should be added to descriptions.
The flags type is used for all of:
The fuzzer has logic to distinguish enums and bit flags, and generates values accordingly. So the general guideline is just to enumerate the meaningful values in flags without adding any “special” values to “help” the current fuzzer logic. When/if the fuzzer logic changes/improves, these manual additions may become unnecessary, or, worse, interfere with the fuzzer ability to generate good values.
syzlang does not require declaring entities before use (like C/C++ does), entities can refer to entities declared later (like in Go). It's recommended to declare things in the order of importance so that the reader sees the most important things first and then proceeds to finer and finer implementation details. For example, system calls usually should go before flag declarations used in these system calls. Note: this order is usually the exact opposite of how things are declared in C: the least important things go first.
The process of compiling the textual syscall descriptions into machine-usable form used by syzkaller to actually generate programs consists of 2 steps.
The first step is extraction of values of symbolic constants from kernel sources using syz-extract utility. syz-extract generates a small C program that includes kernel headers referenced by include directives, defines macros as specified by define directives and prints values of symbolic constants. Results are stored in .const files, one per arch. For example, sys/linux/dev_ptmx.txt is translated into sys/linux/dev_ptmx.txt.const.
The second step is translation of descriptions into Go code using syz-sysgen utility (the actual compiler code lives in pkg/ast and pkg/compiler). This step uses syscall descriptions and the const files generated during the first step and produces instantiations of Syscall and Type types defined in prog/types.go. You can see an example of the compiler output for Linux/AMD64 in sys/linux/gen/amd64.go. This step also generates some minimal syscall metadata for C++ code in executor/syscalls.h.
make extract extracts constants for all *.txt files and for all supported architectures. This may not work for subsystems that are not present in mainline kernel or if you have problems with native kernel compilers, etc. In such cases the syz-extract utility used by make extract can be run manually for single file/arch as:
make bin/syz-extract bin/syz-extract -os linux -arch $ARCH -sourcedir $KSRC -builddir $LINUXBLD <new>.txt make generate make
$ARCH is one of amd64, 386 arm64, arm, ppc64le, mips64le. If the subsystem is supported on several architectures, then run syz-extract for each arch. $LINUX should point to kernel source checkout, which is configured for the corresponding arch (i.e. you need to run make ARCH=arch someconfig && make ARCH=arch there first, remember to add CROSS_COMPILE=arm-linux-gnueabi-/aarch64-linux-gnu-/powerpc64le-linux-gnu- if needed). If the kernel was built into a separate directory (with make O=output_dir, remember to put .config into output_dir, this will be helpful if you'd like to work on different arch at the same time) then also set $LINUXBLD to the location of the build directory.
Descriptions themselves may contain bugs. After running syz-manager with the new descriptions it's always useful to check the kernel code coverage report available in the syz-manager web UI. The report allows to assess if everything one expects to be covered is in fact covered, and if not, where the fuzzer gets stuck. However, this is a useful but quite indirect assessment of the descriptions correctness. The fuzzer may get around some bugs in the descriptions by diverging from what the descriptions say, but it makes it considerably harder for the fuzzer to progress.
Tests stored in sys/OS/test/* provide a more direct testing of the descriptions. Each test is just a program with checked syscall return values. The syntax of the programs is briefly described here. You can also look at the existing examples and at the program deserialization code. AUTO keyword can be used as a value for consts and pointers, for pointers it will lead to some reasonable sequential allocation of memory addresses.
It‘s always good to add a test at least for “the main successful scenario” for the subsystem. It will ensure that the descriptions are actually correct and that it’s possible for the fuzzer to come up with the successful scenario. See io_uring test as a good example.
The tests can be run with the syz-runtest utility as:
make runtest && bin/syz-runtest -config manager.config
syz-runtest boots multiple VMs and runs these tests in different execution modes inside of the VMs.
However, full syz-runtest run takes time, so while developing the test, it's more handy to run it using the syz-execprog utility. To run the test, copy syz-execprog, syz-executor and the test into a manually booted VM and then run the following command inside of the VM:
syz-execprog -debug -threaded=0 mytest
It will show results of all executed syscalls. It's also handy for manual debugging of pseudo-syscall code: if you add some temporal debug calls to the pseudo-syscall, syz-execprog -debug will show their output.
The test syntax can be checked by running:
go test -run=TestParsing ./pkg/runtest