The Fail trait

The Fail trait is a replacement for std::error::Error. It has been designed to support a number of operations:

  • Because it is bound by both Debug and Display, any failure can be printed in two ways.
  • It has both a backtrace and a cause method, allowing users to get information about how the error occurred.
  • It supports wrapping failures in additional contextual information.
  • Because it is bound by Send and Sync, failures can be moved and shared between threads easily.
  • Because it is bound by 'static, the abstract Fail trait object can be downcast into concrete types.

Every new error type in your code should implement Fail, so it can be integrated into the entire system built around this trait. You can manually implement Fail yourself, or you can use the derive for Fail defined in a separate crate and documented here.

Implementors of this trait are called ‘failures’.


Often, an error type contains (or could contain) another underlying error type which represents the “cause” of this error - for example, if your custom error contains an io::Error, that is the cause of your error.

The cause method on the Fail trait allows all errors to expose their underlying cause - if they have one - in a consistent way. Users can loop over the chain of causes, for example, getting the entire series of causes for an error:

// Assume err is a type that implements `Fail`
let mut fail: &Fail = err;

while let Some(cause) = fail.cause() {
    println!("{}", cause);

    // Make `fail` the reference to the cause of the previous fail, making the
    // loop "dig deeper" into the cause chain.
    fail = cause;

Because &Fail supports downcasting, you can also inspect causes in more detail if you are expecting a certain failure:

while let Some(cause) = fail.cause() {

    if let Some(err) = cause.downcast_ref::<io::Error>() {
        // treat io::Error specially
    } else {
        // fallback case

    fail = cause;

For convenience an iterator is also provided:

// Assume err is a type that implements `Fail`
let mut fail: &Fail = err;

for cause in fail.iter_causes() {
    println!("{}", cause);


Errors can also generate a backtrace when they are constructed, helping you determine the place the error was generated and the function chain that called into that. Like causes, this is entirely optional - the authors of each failure have to decide if generating a backtrace is appropriate in their use case.

The backtrace method allows all errors to expose their backtrace if they have one. This enables a consistent method for getting the backtrace from an error:

// We don't even know the type of the cause, but we can still get its
// backtrace.
if let Some(bt) = err.cause().and_then(|cause| cause.backtrace()) {
    println!("{}", bt)

The Backtrace type exposed by failure is different from the Backtrace exposed by the backtrace crate, in that it has several optimizations:

  • It has a no_std compatible form which will never be generated (because backtraces require heap allocation), and should be entirely compiled out.
  • It will not be generated unless the RUST_BACKTRACE environment variable has been set at runtime.
  • Symbol resolution is delayed until the backtrace is actually printed, because this is the most expensive part of generating a backtrace.


Often, the libraries you are using will present error messages that don‘t provide very helpful information about what exactly has gone wrong. For example, if an io::Error says that an entity was “Not Found,” that doesn’t communicate much about what specific file was missing - if it even was a file (as opposed to a directory for example).

You can inject additional context to be carried with this error value, providing semantic information about the nature of the error appropriate to the level of abstraction that the code you are writing operates at. The context method on Fail takes any displayable value (such as a string) to act as context for this error.

Using the ResultExt trait, you can also get context as a convenient method on Result directly. For example, suppose that your code attempted to read from a Cargo.toml. You can wrap the io::Errors that occur with additional context about what operation has failed:

use failure::ResultExt;

let mut file = File::open(cargo_toml_path).context("Missing Cargo.toml")?;
file.read_to_end(&buffer).context("Could not read Cargo.toml")?;

The Context object also has a constructor that does not take an underlying error, allowing you to create ad hoc Context errors alongside those created by applying the context method to an underlying error.

Backwards compatibility

We've taken several steps to make transitioning from std::error to failure as painless as possible.

First, there is a blanket implementation of Fail for all types that implement std::error::Error, as long as they are Send + Sync + 'static. If you are dealing with a library that hasn't shifted to Fail, it is automatically compatible with failure already.

Second, Fail contains a method called compat, which produces a type that implements std::error::Error. If you have a type that implements Fail, but not the older Error trait, you can call compat to get a type that does implement that trait (for example, if you need to return a Box<Error>).

The biggest hole in our backwards compatibility story is that you cannot implement std::error::Error and also override the backtrace and cause methods on Fail. We intend to enable this with specialization when it becomes stable.