tree dd212e1a4b059c6fa9b7b421b6d8bd691017e17f
parent d37cbda5f9a47a4206439632ef4fa1534e66f856
author Whitney Tsang <whitneyt@ca.ibm.com> 1582323339 +0000
committer Whitney Tsang <whitneyt@ca.ibm.com> 1582323504 +0000

[CloneFunction] Update loop headers after cloning all blocks in loop.

Summary:
Blocks in a loop can be in any order as long as the loop header is the
first block in Blocks.
With some order of Blocks, cloneLoopWithPreheader would trigger the
assertion in addBasicBlockToLoop.

Example:

define void @test(i64 %N) {
preheader.i:
  br label %header.i

header.i:
  %i = phi i64 [ 0, %preheader.i ], [ %inc.i, %latch.i ]
  br label %header.j

header.j:
  %j = phi i64 [ 0, %header.i ], [ %inc.j, %latch.j ]
  br label %header.k

header.k:
  %k = phi i64 [ 0, %header.j ], [ %inc.k, %latch.k ]
  call void @baz(i64 %i, i64 %j, i64 %k)
  br label %latch.k

latch.k:
  %inc.k = add nsw i64 %k, 1
  %cmp.k = icmp slt i64 %inc.k, %N
  br i1 %cmp.k, label %header.k, label %latch.j

latch.j:
  %inc.j = add nsw i64 %j, 1
  %cmp.j = icmp slt i64 %inc.j, %N
  br i1 %cmp.j, label %header.j, label %latch.i

latch.i:
  %inc.i = add nsw i64 %i, 1
  %cmp.i = icmp slt i64 %inc.i, %N
  br i1 %cmp.i, label %header.i, label %exit.i

exit.i:
  ret void
}
declare void @baz(i64, i64, i64)
If the blocks of loop-i is in the order: header.i, latch.k, header.k,
header.j, latch.j, latch.i,
then cloneLoopWithPreheader would trigger the assertion in
addBasicBlockToLoop
assert(contains(SameHeader) && getHeader() == SameHeader->getHeader() &&
"Incorrect LI specified for this loop!");

As latch.k is in both loop-j and loop-k, it would be set as the header
of both loops after adding latch.k.
If we update loop headers during cloning blocks, then after adding
header.k,
the header of loop-k would be updated with header.k,
while the header of loop-j stays as latch.k.

When adding header.j, SameHeader is loop-k, SameHeader->getHeader() is
header.k, but getHeader() is latch.k, which trigger the assertion.
Reviewer: jdoerfert, Meinersbur, fhahn, kbarton, hfinkel, bmahjour,
etiotto
Reviewed By: Meinersbur
Subscribers: hiraditya, llvm-commits
Tag: LLVM
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D74382