)]}'
{
  "commit": "e4edf8337e7e58c9643770320430919e8be84ca4",
  "tree": "c9d2d40b09e3fff2485eaff6dd8b729b43a0f2b4",
  "parents": [
    "e343d3cae1ff104999407324a45864c01f05a8f6",
    "7d6f447a4d5b5b2558d88ea1cf0f3de22e7512c9"
  ],
  "author": {
    "name": "Matthias Krüger",
    "email": "476013+matthiaskrgr@users.noreply.github.com",
    "time": "Fri Jul 25 11:16:33 2025 +0200"
  },
  "committer": {
    "name": "GitHub",
    "email": "noreply@github.com",
    "time": "Fri Jul 25 11:16:33 2025 +0200"
  },
  "message": "Rollup merge of #143401 - Enselic:no-stack-backtrace-print-in-display, r\u003ddavidtwco\n\ntests: Don\u0027t check for self-printed output in std-backtrace.rs test\n\nThe `Display` implementation for `Backtrace` used to print\n\n    stack backtrace:\n\nbut that print was since removed. See https://github.com/rust-lang/backtrace-rs/pull/286 and https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/69042. To make the existing test pass, the print was added to the test instead. But it doesn\u0027t make sense to check for something that the test itself does since that will not detect any regressions in the implementation of `Backtrace`.\n\nWhat the test _should_ check is that \"stack backtrace:\" is _not_ printed in `Display` of `Backtrace`. So do that instead.\n\nThis is one small steps towards resolving https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/71706. The next steps after this step involves extending and hardening that test further.\n",
  "tree_diff": []
}