)]}'
{
  "commit": "c17873de2fcc07a933ea72026ab0ea74c2d14bd3",
  "tree": "d997d93c7c11d225bfd7068bf9244a2d40116da2",
  "parents": [
    "529d6da73bae1dad74a95698f1f4abde090d635c",
    "859ee5e1eea2ceb15cd56f5adb83347576df5d50"
  ],
  "author": {
    "name": "Matthias Krüger",
    "email": "476013+matthiaskrgr@users.noreply.github.com",
    "time": "Wed Sep 24 23:33:26 2025 +0200"
  },
  "committer": {
    "name": "GitHub",
    "email": "noreply@github.com",
    "time": "Wed Sep 24 23:33:26 2025 +0200"
  },
  "message": "Rollup merge of #146753 - tiif:unsatisfiable-unstable-feature, r\u003dBoxyUwU\n\nImprove the pretty print of UnstableFeature clause\n\nAs per https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/145095#discussion_r2349439492, we could make the diagnostic for unsatisfiable ``UnstableFeature`` clause better.\n\nr? `@BoxyUwU`\n",
  "tree_diff": []
}