| commit | 2bad3184ed3169139e8a736e9462bec97c93cc2c | [log] [tgz] |
|---|---|---|
| author | bors <bors@rust-lang.org> | Sun Aug 10 02:32:41 2025 +0000 |
| committer | bors <bors@rust-lang.org> | Sun Aug 10 02:32:41 2025 +0000 |
| tree | 8b687c95d6516e09d3de27e46c181f94b1965629 | |
| parent | f8cdf873f1430e0ea115c430f0cdc8f62f928bf4 [diff] | |
| parent | b60057ef93b3d9cc6099ff20370bfdcf706dbf99 [diff] |
Auto merge of #144787 - Kobzol:codegen-backend-restructure, r=jieyouxu Refactor codegen backends in bootstrap This PR refactors the codegen backend steps, in preparation to make more progress on the integration of the GCC codegen backend in bootstrap. It does several things: 1) Splits the `CodegenBackend` step into two, one for clif and another one for gcc. Even though their code is mostly similar, that's IMO mostly fake similarity, and they do (or will) ultimately require different handling. This was already visible in the requirement of building GCC for cg_gcc, of course. 2) It is now possible to build both backends (and dist cranelift) even if they are not specified in `rust.codegen-backends`. It was quite weird that it wasn't possible to even invoke the corresponding codegen backend if the backend wasn't specified in that array, as that array should ideally only change defaults (see later below). 3) Changes the path specification of these steps to an alias. In other words, instead of `compiler/rustc_codegen_cranelift`, the step is now built only using `rustc_codegen_cranelift` or `cg_clif`. This is done to avoid an annoying clash with `x build compiler`, which would otherwise build both codegen backends after the 2) change. 4) Made the copying of codegen backend artifacts more explicit, in particular in the `Assemble` step. 5) Codifies the semantics of `rust.codegen-backends`, which now only affects the defaults of whether a codegen backend will be included in rustc's sysroot and whether it will be disted in `x dist` by default. We can change the behavior later, e.g. to dist cranelift by default in `x dist` once it becomes stabilized. Currently I left the existing behavior that we use on CI, I just tried to document it better. I don't think that this requires a change tracker entry, because the defaults should work the same as before. It is just now possible to do `x build/dist rustc_codegen_cranelift` even if CLIF is not in the `codegen-backends` array. It is no longer possible to do `./x build compiler/rustc_codegen_cranelift` though, not sure if that requires a change tracker entry. There is one thing that I didn't touch yet, and that is the fact that `rust.codegen-backends` not only affects the default behavior of `x dist` w.r.t. Cranelift, but also of `x test`. In other words, `x test rustc_codegen_cranelift` still does not hing if cranelift isn't in `rust.codegen-backends`. I plan to take a look at this once I get to refactoring the test steps. r? `@jieyouxu`
rust-analyzer is a modular compiler frontend for the Rust language. It is a part of a larger rls-2.0 effort to create excellent IDE support for Rust.
https://rust-analyzer.github.io/book/installation.html
If you want to contribute to rust-analyzer check out the CONTRIBUTING.md or if you are just curious about how things work under the hood, see the Contributing section of the manual.
If you want to use rust-analyzer's language server with your editor of choice, check the manual. It also contains some tips & tricks to help you be more productive when using rust-analyzer.
See the security and privacy sections of the manual.
For usage and troubleshooting requests, please use “IDEs and Editors” category of the Rust forum:
https://users.rust-lang.org/c/ide/14
For questions about development and implementation, join rust-analyzer working group on Zulip:
https://rust-lang.zulipchat.com/#narrow/stream/185405-t-compiler.2Frust-analyzer
rust-analyzer is primarily distributed under the terms of both the MIT license and the Apache License (Version 2.0).
See LICENSE-APACHE and LICENSE-MIT for details.