| # Docker Release Process |
| |
| This document describes how the Docker project is released. The Docker project |
| release process targets the Engine, Compose, Kitematic, Machine, Swarm, |
| Distribution, Notary and their underlying dependencies (libnetwork, libkv, |
| etc...). |
| |
| Step-by-step technical details of the process are described in |
| [PATCH-RELEASES.md](https://github.com/moby/moby/blob/master/project/PATCH-RELEASES.md). |
| |
| ## Release cycle |
| |
| The Docker project follows a **time-based release cycle** and ships every nine |
| weeks. A release cycle starts the same day the previous release cycle ends. |
| |
| The first six weeks of the cycle are dedicated to development and review. During |
| this phase, new features and bugfixes submitted to any of the projects are |
| **eligible** to be shipped as part of the next release. No changeset submitted |
| during this period is however guaranteed to be merged for the current release |
| cycle. |
| |
| ## The freeze period |
| |
| Six weeks after the beginning of the cycle, the codebase is officially frozen |
| and the codebase reaches a state close to the final release. A Release Candidate |
| (RC) gets created at the same time. The freeze period is used to find bugs and |
| get feedback on the state of the RC before the release. |
| |
| During this freeze period, while the `master` branch will continue its normal |
| development cycle, no new features are accepted into the RC. As bugs are fixed |
| in `master` the release owner will selectively 'cherry-pick' critical ones to |
| be included into the RC. As the RC changes, new ones are made available for the |
| community to test and review. |
| |
| This period lasts for three weeks. |
| |
| ## How to maximize chances of being merged before the freeze date? |
| |
| First of all, there is never a guarantee that a specific changeset is going to |
| be merged. However there are different actions to follow to maximize the chances |
| for a changeset to be merged: |
| |
| - The team gives priority to review the PRs aligned with the Roadmap (usually |
| defined by a ROADMAP.md file at the root of the repository). |
| - The earlier a PR is opened, the more time the maintainers have to review. For |
| example, if a PR is opened the day before the freeze date, it’s very unlikely |
| that it will be merged for the release. |
| - Constant communication with the maintainers (mailing-list, IRC, GitHub issues, |
| etc.) allows to get early feedback on the design before getting into the |
| implementation, which usually reduces the time needed to discuss a changeset. |
| - If the code is commented, fully tested and by extension follows every single |
| rules defined by the [CONTRIBUTING guide]( |
| https://github.com/docker/docker/blob/master/CONTRIBUTING.md), this will help |
| the maintainers by speeding up the review. |
| |
| ## The release |
| |
| At the end of the freeze (nine weeks after the start of the cycle), all the |
| projects are released together. |
| |
| ``` |
| Codebase Release |
| Start of is frozen (end of the |
| the Cycle (7th week) 9th week) |
| +---------------------------------------+---------------------+ |
| | | | |
| | Development phase | Freeze phase | |
| | | | |
| +---------------------------------------+---------------------+ |
| 6 weeks 3 weeks |
| <---------------------------------------><--------------------> |
| ``` |
| |
| ## Exceptions |
| |
| If a critical issue is found at the end of the freeze period and more time is |
| needed to address it, the release will be pushed back. When a release gets |
| pushed back, the next release cycle gets delayed as well. |