| # Development Report for May 15, 2017 |
| |
| ## Daily Meeting |
| |
| A daily meeting is hosted on [slack](https://dockercommunity.slack.com) every business day at 9am PST on the channel `#moby-project`. |
| During this meeting, we are talking about the [tasks](https://github.com/moby/moby/issues/32867) needed to be done for splitting moby and docker. |
| |
| ## Topics discussed last week |
| |
| ### The CLI split |
| |
| Work is in progress to move the "opts" package to the docker/cli repository. The package, was merged into the docker/cli |
| repository through [docker/cli#82](https://github.com/docker/cli/pull/82), preserving Git history, and parts that are not |
| used in Moby have been removed through [moby/moby#33198](https://github.com/moby/moby/pull/33198). |
| |
| ### Find a good and non-confusing home for the remaining monolith |
| |
| Discussion on this topic is still ongoing, and possible approaches are looked into. The active discussion has moved |
| from GitHub to [https://forums.mobyproject.org/](https://forums.mobyproject.org/t/topic-find-a-good-an-non-confusing-home-for-the-remaining-monolith/37) |
| |
| ### Find a place for `/pkg` |
| |
| Concerns were raised about moving packages to separate repositories, and it was decided to put some extra effort into |
| breaking up / removing existing packages that likely are not good candidates to become a standalone project. |
| |
| ### Update integration-cli tests |
| |
| With the removal of the CLI from the moby repository, new pull requests will have to be tested using API tests instead |
| of using the CLI. Discussion took place whether or not these tests should use the API `client` package, or be completely |
| independent, and make raw HTTP calls. |
| |
| A topic was created on the forum to discuss options: [evolution of testing](https://forums.mobyproject.org/t/evolution-of-testing-moby/38) |
| |
| |
| ### Proposal: split & containerize hack/validate |
| |
| [@AkihiroSuda](https://github.com/AkihiroSuda) is proposing to split and containerize the `hack/validate` script and |
| [started a topic on the forum](https://forums.mobyproject.org/t/proposal-split-containerize-hack-validate/32). An initial |
| proposal to add validation functionality to `vndr` (the vendoring tool in use) was rejected upstream, so alternative |
| approaches were discussed. |
| |
| |
| ### Special Interest Groups |
| |
| A "SIG" category was created on the forums to provide a home for Special Interest Groups. The first SIG, [LinuxKit |
| Security](https://forums.mobyproject.org/t/about-the-linuxkit-security-category/44) was started (thanks |
| [@riyazdf](https://github.com/riyazdf)). |
| |
| |
| ### Builder |
| |
| The builder dev report can be found [here](builder/2017-05-15.md) |