)]}'
{
  "commit": "bd2cda6d87aefd2cdaf11bbfacc60e112ba84ae1",
  "tree": "9fded8de38d0b2ffa99f21d0453105fba6e8eb8c",
  "parents": [
    "dc471a776c8e4d47191d491bde911df33b46b563"
  ],
  "author": {
    "name": "Steven Grady",
    "email": "slgrady@fuchsia.infra.roller.google.com",
    "time": "Mon Apr 13 15:14:03 2026 -0700"
  },
  "committer": {
    "name": "Copybara-Service",
    "email": "copybara-worker@google.com",
    "time": "Mon Apr 13 15:16:57 2026 -0700"
  },
  "message": "[roll] Roll fuchsia [ffxutil] improve strict handling\n\nThere were some info messages that were incorrect regarding ffx command\ninvocation.\n\nIn addition, there was a check that prevented \"Run()\" from being\ninvoked in strict mode. But since \"ffx --strict\" will actually report\nan error when the target is not there, that check was redundant. Since\nsome commands actually don\u0027t require a target (such as ffx repository\npublish), this was particularly troublesome.\n\nOriginal-Reviewed-on: https://fuchsia-review.googlesource.com/c/fuchsia/+/1571893\nOriginal-Revision: 8f6d2cfec8ad91fa88e35deec2f83491cfebea13\nGitOrigin-RevId: 62436b4ebc6521c9cc3f5d65a18229bc00bfce2a\nChange-Id: I7590596ac1bead6f04ea4deda935a1a5e42b6533\n",
  "tree_diff": [
    {
      "type": "modify",
      "old_id": "7c0b94fb7b43f19c66779c378d42922d8ad4ae9b",
      "old_mode": 33188,
      "old_path": "stem",
      "new_id": "e85aae1a2c4086f05148d33114f34fcdfb2f4df0",
      "new_mode": 33188,
      "new_path": "stem"
    }
  ]
}