)]}'
{
  "commit": "8d8d9be611fa8c752b10990545ec6e456e698257",
  "tree": "4e09eecd2ab3682747f08e2dacc56c793c19e0f7",
  "parents": [
    "51f3a7c51ca12f7da3a191e14978ab4602b5aa34"
  ],
  "author": {
    "name": "John Grossman",
    "email": "johngro@fuchsia.infra.roller.google.com",
    "time": "Fri Nov 21 15:01:27 2025 -0800"
  },
  "committer": {
    "name": "Copybara-Service",
    "email": "copybara-worker@google.com",
    "time": "Fri Nov 21 15:04:58 2025 -0800"
  },
  "message": "[roll] Roll fuchsia [kernel][iommu] Fix size issue.\n\nFix a size issue when attempting to create an ARM SMMU instance, but\nbacking off to a Stub IOMMU instead (as the ARM SMMU implementation\nhas not landed yet). The user has passed a structure holding a\n`zx_iommu_desc_arm_smmu_t`, but the stub IOMMU is expecting a\n`zx_iommu_desc_stub_t` instead.  When the stub implementation sees\nthis, it gets upset and raises an error.  (thanks to\nsurajmalhotra@google.com for catching this).\n\nThe StubIommu implementation does not actually need any configuration\nat all, so this is all a bit silly.  Fix this (in the short term) by\neliminating (at the kernel implementation level) the need to pass any\nstructure at all.  Eventually, we should eliminate the requirement to\npass any structure at all from user-mode, as is being tracked in\nb/462772483.\n\nSee also fxr/1429619\n\nOriginal-Bug: 462772483\nOriginal-Reviewed-on: https://fuchsia-review.googlesource.com/c/fuchsia/+/1430497\nOriginal-Revision: d7615632d4a62b2db86a277c4b80c553b8071b0e\nGitOrigin-RevId: d014d8f7f5e7107a33762dd479d7c21162e0004c\nChange-Id: I4de0a0ca4bea8d52c1777f959f9aa8a06f5d6f22\n",
  "tree_diff": [
    {
      "type": "modify",
      "old_id": "c27658a0ccc79e4b994fa122e8af6ac76dc49c66",
      "old_mode": 33188,
      "old_path": "stem",
      "new_id": "f0aba16467c2300e89f3362b6901875e90df322b",
      "new_mode": 33188,
      "new_path": "stem"
    }
  ]
}