FIDL Cross-Petal Change Tests

These are tests to validate source-compatibility through various changes to FIDL libraries. They do not test binary-compatibility. Tests for compiled languages are only meant to be built, not executed, since source-compatibility issues show up at compile time.

This directory consists of:

• Tools to generate source compatibility tests. The usage of these tools is explained in the Writing tests section.
  • A command line tool, located under gen/.
  • A gn template for building source compatibility tests, defined in fidl_source_compatibility.gni.
• The source compatibility tests themselves. Each test is located in a separate directory, which ideally follows the [parent]-[target]-[change] format used in the FIDL ABI/API compatibility guide. These tests are generated using the tool above, and also each contain a generated README.md file describing the transition being tested.

Writing tests (#writing-tests)

A test is declared by defining a test JSON configuration and adding a source_compatibility_test target to the build (for examples, see the test.json files within each test directory). This is done by running the source compatibility gen tool.

The rest of the commands in this README assume that this tool is aliased, e.g. by adding the following to your rc file:

alias scompat=$FUCHSIA_DIR/src/tests/fidl/source_compatibility/gen/main.py

A high level overview of the flow for creating a test using the tools is as follows:

• Run the test scaffolding tool, giving it the name of the directory it will be written to, e.g. scompat generate_test foo-rename-bar.
• The first step (“Step 0”) of the tool will ask you to define the test title as well as the initial states of the FIDL library and for each binding. It will ask you for the filename, write a stub file, then pause to let you fill out the contents of the file.
• At this step (and after each subsequent step), the tool will output a test.json file containing the current state of the test, and a BUILD.gn file declaring a target for the test.
  • You should add the target defined in the build file to the root source compatibility test group, so that you can build the test at each step, as you write it.
  • It can also be helpful to keep the test.json file open as you use the tool to verify the changes it makes. You can correct any typos or other mistakes that were provided to the tool by editing the JSON file, then running scompat regen.
• The tool will then alternate between asking you to define the next FIDL change and the next bindings change. It will prefill the source files for the next step with the contents of the file from the previous step.
• Since the tool output (e.g. test.json) is updated at each step, you can simply quit the tool when the transition is complete. It can also be helpful to build the test between adding steps to ensure that they are correct. Note however that the tool does not save the state until you complete the current step.

Modifying existing tests:

If you call the tool on an existing test (i.e. a directory containing a test.json file), it will resume from where you last left off. In other words, the tool will only append new steps to the test, and cannot insert or otherwise edit existing steps. You must make edits manually by modifying the source files and test.json file yourself, then run scompat regen to regenerate the auxiliary files that are based on the test.json, such as the README and GN sidecar file.

The test JSON structure is defined in gen/types_.py, which contains a number of classes which correspond directly to the test JSON.

Debugging tests:

When a test fails to compile, the failure output will contain a path to a place somewhere in your out directory (what the path represents depends on the binding, e.g. for C++ the path is the path to the .o file, whereas for Dart it's the path that the source file is copied to before building), that will tell you exactly which test/FIDL file/source file combination the error is coming from. For example, if you see the directory

protocoleventremove_dart_step_03_after_step_02_during_dart_package

somewhere in the path, you can deduce the following based on the ordering:

• The test protocoleventremove.
• The language is dart.
• The FIDL step being used is step_03_after.
• The source file being used is step_02_during.

From this, you can deduce that the files in question are protocol-event-remove/fidl/step_03_after.test.fidl and protocol-event-remove/fidl/step_02_during.dart, and use that to debug the compile error.

“Reverse” tests:

Many tests are symmetrical: for example, removing a method consists of the same steps as adding a method, but backwards. Currently, the source compatibility tool provides a way to “bootstrap” a new test based on an existing one, by running it in reverse. For example, if you have a test protocol-method-add and want to generate the symmetric protocol-method-remove test based on it, you can run:

scompat generate_reverse protocol-method-add protocol-method-remove

This will create a copy of the method add test but in reverse. After generating the test, there are two additional manual steps:

• Rename the FIDL library used in the test. For example, replace all instances of protocolmethoadd with protocolmethodremove inside of the protocol-method-remove/ test.
• Update the transition instructions for the test. Generally, this will involve negating any existing instructions. For example, an instruction of "add method foo", would become "remove method foo" in the reversed test.

Transition terminology

We sometimes give transitions that follow a specific pattern a name to make it easier to refer to these kinds of transitions when discussing them.

One set of terms we use is “FIDL assisted” and “source assisted”: when transitioning a FIDL library involves an initial state (before), an intermediate state (during), and a final state (after), depending on the bindings used and the kind of change made to the FIDL library, the transition is either FIDL-assisted or source-assisted.

FIDL-assisted

In a FIDL-assisted transition, you change source code while the FIDL library is held in a transitional state (e.g., using the Transitional attribute). For these transitions, we test four states:

Source-assisted

In a source-assisted transition, you change the FIDL library while source code held is in a transitional state (e.g., using default: in switch statements). This would lead to testing four states:

However, certain FIDL changes require a FIDL-assisted transition in some bindings and a source-assisted transition in others. Suppose we make a change in FIDL library L requiring a FIDL-assisted transition in bindings A and source-assisted in bindings B. We would take the following steps:

1. Initially, L, A, and B are before.
2. Change B to during.
3. Change L to during.
4. Change A to after.
5. Change L to after.
6. Change B to after.

All correct ways of interleaving the steps will have L and B both in the during state at some point. Therefore, although a FIDL during state is unnecessary for a pure source-assisted transition, we must include it in tests. Thus, we actually test 5 states for source-assisted transitions: